Message from @Leohte
Discord ID: 672877480104951819
They -own- Arm Holdings, Dostayer
They own the company that has the patents to every RISC chip that's in pretty much every smartphone and tablet on the planet
In every router/network device
But there you go, the problems have been laid out - i've offered two alternatives to fix the problem
If there are alternatives, i'm all ears
What? Softbank is Japanese
And they own ARM holdings
That's odd, there were government enquiries at the time as to whether we should be allowing the chinese to buy it
I think you are mistaking them for broadcom
ye arm was bought by softbank
The reason why no western company (actually, even Huwawei fabricates its chips in Taiwan) is because they would be forced to transfer the technology to a Chinese partner/government
They're catching up
Look who fabricates the chips
TSMC is a Taiwanese company
Cant wait for brexit
Another faux impasse removed
Either way, toddle off and come up with an alternative to right-to-repair, or mandatory long warranties
Fuck the chinks
simple as
RtR is coming to the question of private property, thus it seems to me like a place for a government intervention for protection property rights
The notion of private property will die if you do nothing
Or the environment will
Again
The main question that RtR is actually going around is who owns the phone after purchase
The person who bought it
Well
The manufacturers are arguing that you only loan it from them.
And you're OK with that?
I agree with you BTW
No
Not at all
Then why the hesitation?
That's why I've said it's a case of property rights which the companies should lose
It's not about forcing the company to produce something, it's about who owns the phone.
Thus, RtR should go through m
Nothing i've said implies forcing companies to produce something
With the ports? We are talking about something that changes over time, under this law, USB C would've never existed if it needed to conform the law.