Message from @notaglobe

Discord ID: 679638986569941010


2020-02-19 10:37:34 UTC  

Im only talking about their public healthcare

2020-02-19 10:37:40 UTC  

and our public healthcare

2020-02-19 10:38:04 UTC  

Which is a flawed analysis.
Apples and oranges my dude

2020-02-19 10:38:26 UTC  

they pay $3trn in taxes a year which goes to healthcare that most of them dont have access to

2020-02-19 10:38:38 UTC  

.

Totally separate note Wacka - we don't do contact work, only full time sorry mate

2020-02-19 10:38:58 UTC  

I think low income earners, OAPs and veterans get access

2020-02-19 10:39:03 UTC  

.

Yeah it's a broken system - everyone agreea

2020-02-19 10:39:22 UTC  

Nah, vets get a special hybrid

2020-02-19 10:39:46 UTC  

OAPs get an NHS like service.
Ultra poor have different options

2020-02-19 10:40:15 UTC  

The reason they complain about oap care is because it's like the NHS.

2020-02-19 10:40:31 UTC  

I.e. they choose who to treat who dies ect

2020-02-19 10:40:46 UTC  

I assume they could get private if they wanted

2020-02-19 10:40:54 UTC  

Waiting times before and after retirement are months apart literally

2020-02-19 10:41:05 UTC  

Yeah most OAPs have private in the usa

2020-02-19 10:41:27 UTC  

Sorry, most sensible oaps

2020-02-19 10:41:55 UTC  

You can negotiate that into your employment package and 401k (pension)

2020-02-19 10:41:56 UTC  

and most people in the UK have private too... through work or just private (although I dont think that many take up just private on their own)

2020-02-19 10:42:14 UTC  

and theres people like my mother who had private and just hardly ever used it

2020-02-19 10:42:32 UTC  

cos theres an excess and the treatment isnt much different

2020-02-19 10:42:40 UTC  

Through work stuff in the UK is actually a terrible system.
It encourages doctors to flee the NHS after we paid 100% of their tuition

2020-02-19 10:42:41 UTC  

> most people

2020-02-19 10:42:44 UTC  

don't say that

2020-02-19 10:43:39 UTC  

If the doc paid for his education he should go wherever he wants, if the state did I want to see a loyalty cause in the contract

2020-02-19 10:43:57 UTC  

@Jes i've advocated in the past for us putting a binding term on doctors, they work for the NHS for 10 or 20 year mandetory before they can leave, and the state swallows the education burden

2020-02-19 10:44:09 UTC  

We already do it for teachers

2020-02-19 10:44:27 UTC  

Certain subjects at least

2020-02-19 10:44:28 UTC  

but we stagger the "pay-back" of the tuition in such a way that after x years a % is paid back, so that people can choose to leave early and own the cost personally

2020-02-19 10:44:51 UTC  

to be fair, i wouldnt expect that in other areas... like if british people got a grant for IT courses...

2020-02-19 10:44:59 UTC  

so for example, say we go with 20 years for free education: after the 10th year each additional year brings your debt 10% down

2020-02-19 10:45:20 UTC  

I'm down with that.
Say it's 1 mil in education. You leave before year 20 it's 50k a year you owe

2020-02-19 10:45:27 UTC  

Now there is a down side

2020-02-19 10:45:30 UTC  

@wacka this is talking to make it free

2020-02-19 10:45:37 UTC  

so society prioritises doctors

2020-02-19 10:45:49 UTC  

Doctors are already a free course in the uk

2020-02-19 10:45:59 UTC  

sweeping reform

2020-02-19 10:45:59 UTC  

The doctorate part at least

2020-02-19 10:46:14 UTC  

it would be politically painful

2020-02-19 10:46:27 UTC  

but we need to sort out the incentives here

2020-02-19 10:46:28 UTC  

is that still the case though? I thought brown ended education grants... or might have been DC

2020-02-19 10:46:34 UTC  

Abolish the GP system, it's a quasi-private system

2020-02-19 10:46:48 UTC  

i'm ok with a mixture of public and private