I like it tho xD
ill quote you when i use it
he also goes on to use the guilt by association that youtube also uses to delete peoples channels
"i dont want it to be taken out of context"
"i dont want advertises to see that"
"youtube is advertiser friendly, this content is not allowed"
Its pretty ridiculous.
the argument is about whether companies should be allowed to refuse service
cos hes arguing that its his comments section so he gets to decide who comments
Its like deciding who can review a product.
youtube argues its their platform so they get to decide who has a channel
yeah yeah
you pick people you like
what happens when the banks refuse you service
what about the grocers
print your own money? grow your own food?
the NHS refusing to serve you if you're "racist".
Banks have banned people too because media outlets go to them saying. "did you know one of your customers is a Nazi, are you a Nazi."
yeah richard spencer
this is why you should have to bake the cake
@Eccles
hmm
Businesses should be forced to serve any customer?
if no-one defends NHS treatment for "racists" .. then they better keep quite when they decide "prisoners and violent offenders" wont get treatment
I never thought of it like that about banks.
what happens if society refuses you service?
can the police?
i mean hospitals can
why not the police
the firemen
thats what chinas social credit system is for
we've all decide you're a bad person so none of us will serve you
tbf firemen already dont do anything once the immediate threat is over...
a doctor will fix your broken bones, then treat you for weeks after
I would normally say the baker shouldnt be forced to server anyone but thats a tricky one there.
a fireman puts out the fire, then says, hope you got insurance for all this burnt up sht
well firemen fight fires not homelessness
@cheiften98 its the core of the issue, if anyone can refuse you service, what if everyone did
i mean it is their property after all
go live in the woods bucko
i wont sell you a house
