we've all decide you're a bad person so none of us will serve you

tbf firemen already dont do anything once the immediate threat is over...

a doctor will fix your broken bones, then treat you for weeks after

I would normally say the baker shouldnt be forced to server anyone but thats a tricky one there.

a fireman puts out the fire, then says, hope you got insurance for all this burnt up sht

well firemen fight fires not homelessness

@cheiften98 its the core of the issue, if anyone can refuse you service, what if everyone did

i mean it is their property after all

go live in the woods bucko

i wont sell you a house

i wont give you a job

Thats a big flaw with libertarianism.

negative

ancaps you'r thinking of

I swear when I was a kid, I remember shops having signs saying "we can refuse you service for any reason"

liber allows regulation

I would say im a conservative libertarian but thats a tricky one.

libertarians are against regulation tho?

some people would say the power of money is too strong

not all of it thats the difference between libertarians and anarchists

libertarians are small gov not no gov

muh roads

hmm

ancaps are no govs dont violate the NAP kinda guys

ancaps? anarchists?

anarchist capitalists

ah

stefan molyjew

libertarians can also be big gov... but a gov that protects individual rights, and free markets (if lib-right)

dont know much about anarchists.

big gov relatively

some doesnt mean loads

it would have to be to protect a free market

some things like having food standards make sense tbh

i mean no1 would by a product that killed them but someone has to die to find that out

How could you regulate businesses then to force them to serve people?

if I put up my lemonade stand, who will make sure the consumers have equal access to mine and "big lemonade inc"

quality of opportunity =/= equality of outcome

e*

correct

and thats not what I said