not all of it thats the difference between libertarians and anarchists
libertarians are small gov not no gov
muh roads
hmm
ancaps are no govs dont violate the NAP kinda guys
ancaps? anarchists?
anarchist capitalists
ah
stefan molyjew
libertarians can also be big gov... but a gov that protects individual rights, and free markets (if lib-right)
dont know much about anarchists.
big gov relatively
some doesnt mean loads
it would have to be to protect a free market
some things like having food standards make sense tbh
i mean no1 would by a product that killed them but someone has to die to find that out
How could you regulate businesses then to force them to serve people?
if I put up my lemonade stand, who will make sure the consumers have equal access to mine and "big lemonade inc"
quality of opportunity =/= equality of outcome
e*
correct
and thats not what I said
so you dont need equal access
omg you know walkers crisps. You can tell the food standards are better in the UK than in the US and EU. Christ. they're so greasy here in Spain.
of course you need equal access
to your lemonade stand?
Maybe thats just lays and nothing to do with food standards.
we have EU standards
so its the same
if customers never even get to your product, then you dont have equal opportunity, for customers to decide which is best
they can drive there of their own free will
yes
so they have access
and a gov needs to step in if big lemonade inc is stopping them
yeah thats what "small government" is for
to stop millionaires shooting everyone until they have a monopoly
small gov aint gonna stop big lemonade inc
muh roads that you can drive on to get to the lemonade stand are also made by the government so you cant be refused service and thus have access
ok, so big lemonade inc can build a huge stand in front, behind and to either side... but leave a small walkway?
seems like the customer isnt really getting the choice in this free market
Where would you guys line on the political spectrum? This is really interesting.
