Message from @cheiften98
Discord ID: 679739463962066964
Businesses should be forced to serve any customer?
if no-one defends NHS treatment for "racists" .. then they better keep quite when they decide "prisoners and violent offenders" wont get treatment
I never thought of it like that about banks.
what happens if society refuses you service?
can the police?
i mean hospitals can
why not the police
the firemen
thats what chinas social credit system is for
we've all decide you're a bad person so none of us will serve you
tbf firemen already dont do anything once the immediate threat is over...
a doctor will fix your broken bones, then treat you for weeks after
I would normally say the baker shouldnt be forced to server anyone but thats a tricky one there.
a fireman puts out the fire, then says, hope you got insurance for all this burnt up sht
well firemen fight fires not homelessness
@cheiften98 its the core of the issue, if anyone can refuse you service, what if everyone did
i mean it is their property after all
go live in the woods bucko
i wont sell you a house
i wont give you a job
negative
ancaps you'r thinking of
I swear when I was a kid, I remember shops having signs saying "we can refuse you service for any reason"
liber allows regulation
I would say im a conservative libertarian but thats a tricky one.
libertarians are against regulation tho?
some people would say the power of money is too strong
not all of it thats the difference between libertarians and anarchists
libertarians are small gov not no gov
muh roads
hmm
ancaps are no govs dont violate the NAP kinda guys
ancaps? anarchists?
anarchist capitalists
ah
stefan molyjew
libertarians can also be big gov... but a gov that protects individual rights, and free markets (if lib-right)
dont know much about anarchists.
big gov relatively
some doesnt mean loads