stonks

I didnt say that

nope, i don't need to make a choice

i can walk away from it

it is fair to make the choice of no choice

you can walk away from it, which is the choice to save 1 person

at the expense of 50 million

no it's not

yes it is

that is the choice you are making?

a refusal to engage is not to say the default is the one i pick

Making it purely about numbers defeats the point wladfa is trying to make

which i understand

Although i may not be able to articulate it into words, it is a choice i understand one has the ability to make

I see inaction as a choice

You can even be prosecuted for inaction I believe

the argument of "1life is too much" would mean that no matter what choice i make, blood will be directly tied to my hands

some people cant make that kind of choice

you can be prosecuted for everything

that doesn't make it correct

the 2 options are change it, or leave it in the default state, so i dont see how ignoring the problem is anything other than leaving it in the default state

you get involved you get prosecuted, you don't you get prosecuted

@Harrybaxter♫♫♩♫‿◦ then let soomeone else make that choice

you missed the point @Harrybaxter♫♫♩♫‿◦

there isnt another person in the scenario though

Well then

the continued original path would be taken

That doesnt make it correct

of course it doesnt

none of the choices are correct

but maybe some people cant make that kind of bloody choice

they're all bad

if none of the choices are correct then neither of them are incorrect

you can make a correct choice in a bad situation though

exactly

thus, i refuse

in terms of numbers you can be correct

no

your version of correct is purely based on numbers

yes.

no