Message from @notaglobe
Discord ID: 680868196689117234
Re. Tard. Ed.
Its not tho
because you have no knowledge of what the lifeforms are, just that there is a choice of either 50 million, or one
1 life is too much
you're telling me you save every ant hill when some snow is coming?
or some flood?
But you have the choice as an agent
1 life is too much, so you sacrifice 50 million to save the 1
bollocks
As in someone with agency
stonks
I didnt say that
nope, i don't need to make a choice
i can walk away from it
it is fair to make the choice of no choice
you can walk away from it, which is the choice to save 1 person
at the expense of 50 million
no it's not
yes it is
that is the choice you are making?
Making it purely about numbers defeats the point wladfa is trying to make
which i understand
Although i may not be able to articulate it into words, it is a choice i understand one has the ability to make
I see inaction as a choice
You can even be prosecuted for inaction I believe
the argument of "1life is too much" would mean that no matter what choice i make, blood will be directly tied to my hands
some people cant make that kind of choice
you can be prosecuted for everything
that doesn't make it correct
the 2 options are change it, or leave it in the default state, so i dont see how ignoring the problem is anything other than leaving it in the default state
you get involved you get prosecuted, you don't you get prosecuted
@Harrybaxter♫♫♩♫‿◦ then let soomeone else make that choice
you missed the point @Harrybaxter♫♫♩♫‿◦
there isnt another person in the scenario though
Well then
the continued original path would be taken
That doesnt make it correct
of course it doesnt
none of the choices are correct
but maybe some people cant make that kind of bloody choice