Message from @Sq crcl

Discord ID: 683411101794566282


2020-02-29 19:43:52 UTC  

she fancy herself as a chemist as well, as she tries out various drugs on her channel

2020-02-29 19:44:34 UTC  

hmmm ... the press conference ended: Trump did a pretty good job, aside from misunderstanding (I think) 3 questions

2020-02-29 19:45:57 UTC  

AHAHAHAHAHAHA

2020-02-29 19:49:28 UTC  

I wonder how much after the general elections in Slovakia will they suddenly discover an infected.

2020-02-29 19:57:07 UTC  

The last thing he said was something along the lines of "its not a big deal, we'll handle it"

2020-02-29 19:57:16 UTC  

Pretty cringe

2020-02-29 19:57:35 UTC  

Maybe he'll think of something better to say

2020-02-29 19:58:49 UTC  

Don't forget, he has an obligation to reassure and calm people. Most likely 'lying' is the best strategy rn.

2020-02-29 19:59:15 UTC  

But all the team did the same

2020-02-29 19:59:17 UTC  

I mean China is lying for weeks and nothing

2020-02-29 19:59:55 UTC  

I think they were caught unexpectedly and now trying to gain some time for the preparations.

2020-02-29 20:00:15 UTC  

Just a *silly* theory of mine

2020-02-29 20:00:39 UTC  

That's why the gag orders on the emergency responders earlier

2020-02-29 20:23:26 UTC  

that CO2 incident is not just normal stupid, that advanced stupid<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2020-02-29 20:27:33 UTC  

Um...
This isn't looking like a 2.3% *mortadella* rate

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/678532257924907018/683410050080833547/Screenshot11.png

2020-02-29 20:31:43 UTC  

One of my fav quote says: *"When the government tells you not to panic, it's the time actually to panic."*

2020-02-29 20:32:25 UTC  

"community spread"

2020-02-29 20:32:37 UTC  

uuh..... pretty sure you get enough communities, its the entire nation

2020-02-29 20:32:39 UTC  

<:comfort:592107824826417204>

2020-02-29 20:32:43 UTC  

very very high risk = not a pandemic

<:hypers:654439239055835158> pandemic time <:hypers:654439239055835158>

2020-02-29 21:00:14 UTC  

<:hypers:654439239055835158> <:Pepe_God:462291834182303744> <:comfort:592107824826417204>

2020-02-29 21:03:38 UTC  

I'm trying to figure out how deadly/serious of an illness it actually is

2020-02-29 21:03:51 UTC  

And how close it is to spreading to my area

2020-02-29 21:04:02 UTC  

I work in Raleigh

2020-02-29 21:04:15 UTC  

First us death in washington

```The receptor binding domain (RBD) in the spike protein of SARS-CoV and SARS-related coronaviruses is the most variable part of the virus genome. Six residues in the RBD appear to be critical for binding to the human ACE2 receptor and determining host range1. Using coordinates based on the Urbani strain of SARS-CoV, they are Y442, L472, N479, D480, T487, and Y4911. The corresponding residues in SARS-CoV-2 are L455, F486, Q493, S494, N501, and Y505. Five of these six residues are mutated in SARS-CoV-2 compared to its most closely related virus, RaTG13 sampled from a Rhinolophus affinis bat, to which it is ~96% identical2 (Figure 1a). Based on modeling1 and biochemical experiments3,4, SARS-CoV-2 seems to have an RBD that may bind with high affinity to ACE2 from human, non-human primate, ferret, pig, and cat, as well as other species with high receptor homology1. In contrast, SARS-CoV-2 may bind less efficiently to ACE2 in other species associated with SARS-like viruses, including rodents and civets1. ``` http://virological.org/t/the-proximal-origin-of-sars-cov-2/398 make my stoinks go up even more <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608> !

2020-02-29 21:04:46 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/678532257924907018/683419415530045441/IMG_20200229_160433.jpg

```I concur with this analysis at the amino acid level. I would add, however, that even if two virus isolates have an IDENTICAL amino acid sequence, that would not automatically make one the origin of the other. In my post 10 days ago, Tackling Rumors of a Suspicious Origin of nCoV2019 , I showed that mutations in the 3rd wobble base in an otherwise conserved region accumulate as to make seemingly identical viruses very much separated in time – indeed over decades.

It is time to leave playing “who’s ur daddy” to daytime television. No known viral RNA sequence is the daddy of SARS-CoV-2. No match. If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit. It is all bat guano. Whatever analogy you like. A thrust of distrust and recrimination is not the path to protecting the planet from a viral catastrophe.

Bill Gallaher``` http://virological.org/t/the-proximal-origin-of-sars-cov-2/398/2 Based Gallaher back at it again <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>

2020-02-29 21:07:34 UTC  

translate that into normie for me

2020-02-29 21:07:44 UTC  

is he saying basically that its for sure man-made?

2020-02-29 21:08:20 UTC  

He's not

No, he is saying that they will never find the exact origin of the virus, and therefore should try to use their resources elsewhere.

2020-02-29 21:09:47 UTC  

What I got out of it is that they found some really close matches, but are unable to determine its origin definitely. And that finding the origin wont help with preventing a pandemic

No shit <:smugon:512048583806025739> is exactly what I wrote and they even admit to it that its proximal origin <:smugon:512048583806025739>

TL;DR Use your resources elsewhere.