@GCMoney "One is designed to entice, the other is purely up to free will"

pls elaborate

ah, because socialist idiocy. what about this? i call it the "sacrificial district"
pick a segment of territory, make sure it has all the foundations, materials, roads and such necessary to make an autonomous state work
give it to whoever's the most prominent marxist/socialist/similar interested in politics to administer in whichever way they see fit. no restrictions outside of barebones human rights and most especially, freedom of mobility.
a place where marxists can do whatever they please as long as they allow people to leave

it'll be a ruined district that'll have to be resupplied every generation or so for new "it'll work this time" retards to shatter their illusions on impact with reality, but the rest of the nation will be able to move forward unhindered by leftarded idiocy
yeah it a wall o text

@Thundermark questionable loli content functions as an 'in' because its made by and for the purpose of getting off to that shit. GTA wasnt DESIGNED to run over hookers

I've had some good burgers in my time. Uh I... I love a good swiss, melted swiss cheese and much- roasted mushrooms and caramelized onions on a burger. Uh that is hot stuff, you can get that at a number of different places

assuming thats what we're talking about i showed a bit late @Thundermark

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) @Harrybaxter♫♫♩♫‿◦
At least I have functioning **balls,** eunuch <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

OOF

I'm not convinced you have any balls at all

are they really functioning if you only want to use them to cum inside people who are too young to get pregnant?

thunder do you fantasize about having sex with children?

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) Ask your mum, she was gargling them all last night <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

@Harrybaxter♫♫♩♫‿◦ the argument is against loli porn right?

yes

yeah i agree with u

i dont see how anyone couldnt agree with me

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) I am no longer going to dignify your terminal retardation w/ a response

its problematic and enables ppl

does Sargon know that one of his subscribers is a pedo?

> i dont see how anyone couldnt agree with me
<:npc:502497359419408384>

you're not denying it

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Methinks the lady doth protest too much <:smugon:512048583806025739>@excursion12 (redha, richtginger)

now you sound like an NPC

having sex with a child is wrong > child porn encourages the abuse of children for sexual recreation > images depicting children sexually will and does encourage people to seek out actual child porn

https://youtu.be/r3T8WbthnZ4

can you think for yourself?

can you defend yourself?

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) "MOHHHHHM! He didn't *agwee* w/ me, so I called him a stinky doo-doo head!" <:FuzzyPeach:583773935385182231>

harry the problem is you need evidence for that last statement

@Thundermark <:WaitWhatArmy:590858815189024778>

the fact that a lot of pedos also happen to seek out lolicon should be enough of a proof.

I’m watching a documentary on the suffragettes and Susan B Anthony looks like a fucking man

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) From what, a pathetic lower-life-form as you? You don't even *register* on my threat radar <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

no harry because that's not causation that's correlation

thunder you're the very embodiment of fuzzypeach rn

I'm agreeing with you on some things here

> having sex with a child is wrong > child porn encourages the abuse of children for sexual recreation > images depicting children sexually will and does encourage people to seek out actual child porn
killing people is wrong > violent media encourages killing for the sake of recreation > media depicting violent murder will and does encourage people to seek out actual footage of murders

child abuse is obviously bad but yo argument is shite