Message from @MoistBread
Discord ID: 683160784179822610
Sure. I just need some advice on an idea I had at work the other day regarding my Instrument
And thank you
Hit us with da plan
These two instruments have the same design and set up right ?
With he tail peice and bridge
Yes tail piece and bridge
So. I had an idea to do something like this
@MoistBread not necessarily. We don't know their internal layout
Resonance chambers may be totally different
That's true
I was thinking something like this
It's less of a carpentry question, more of a moosic one
Where you can take one set of horns off , and switch for another set
they have cross-brackets and reinforcement "bridges" to hold the string riser
Simply making two into one
And they may be vastly different inside
Not to mention that the volume of the resonance chamber/cavity may vary too
True ...
I thought it was a neat idea
Besides... that is not so much carpentry, but musical instrument building
A violin, guitar or a cello maker would be able to tell you much more about that
I was wondering if making a set up like this would affect the structural integrity of the instrument or if I should make another one entirely
Form is not strictly necessary for an instrument - it's the reverb of the resonance chamber that matters
Alrighty. I'll send a few pics of the body tomorrow morning. I have it all finished except for a few designs but the body itself is finished mostly
Well, for structural integrity in any string instrument you need to counteract the string tension without deformation (or without too much of it)
And in some also have a string riser hold that load too
Like it had in the picture of the lyre
Some instruments just have so much wood that string tension and shape don't really matter
Those are essentially overbuilt
But for something as light and thin-walled as cello, the shape has to be what it is for structural integrity
That's the thickness of the sound box . And it's about 3.5 inches thick
To me it appears to be like two guitar necks joined at the top