my third
`if the sampling is big enough, you'll get the same correlation via just random chance` but this is still nonsense

the bigger the sampling the more precise the statistics

a hypothesis must be tested or it's just speculation. a proper scientific test has exactly ONE control variable and ONE test variable

a statistical analysis performed on a set of people which cannot be adequately randomized yields no meaningful data. it's like trying to say that being born on Tuesday reduces your average lifespan because of all the people that ever existed that were born on Tuesday, that day had the lowest avg life expectancy

post memes

@shmutz by your same numbers, one can say that BECAUSE people are being violent, they have less TIME to mate as well as fewer oppurtunties to be alone without endagering their lives

factorA << -- >> factorB

correlations go both ways

@ManAnimal but you seem to argue that there's no effects of an uneven distribution of men to women which would be a dubious claim, especially when statistics indicate that this factor at least partially plays a role

no, i am arguing that your data doesn't allow for one to draw any meaningful conclusions because it's a simple matter of scope

`by your same numbers, one can say that BECAUSE people are being violent, they have less TIME to mate as well as fewer oppurtunties to be alone without endagering their lives` lol that makes little sense since you can't argue that there's less women than men in china because of an increase of violence

I can’t watch that. Obese people make me sick

@Skoal lol then don't eat them

what you call 'a partial role' has an EQUAL chance of being : 1) the result for the inverse application of your interpretation 2) the result of sampling one circumstance more often than another or 3) random chance

the phrase 'a partial role' implies that factorA is KNOW to be a function of factorB ie. f(A) =b^2+ x

but f(A) = b^2+x is NOT equivalent to f(B) = a^2 + x

Get this math shit outta the meme channel

get your life out of this reality

Good one

that one-liner was cringe, MA

lore, you are so low IQ if you cringe, it's complement

https://pbfcomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/PBF267-The-Breakthrough.png

Cringing is a natural action though

says the retard

Idfk what type of genetic abnormality YOU are if you've never cringed

more natural to beat the retard sensless than cringe

abnormality? none. i have the ability to just silence you at will

you lack that ability

thus you have to cringe

>by way of block

`but f(A) = b^2+x is NOT equivalent to f(B) = a^2 + x` this isn't even my argument you dunce lol. I never argued that the causation of one to another is interchangeable, hence `you can't argue that there's less women than men in china because of an increase of violence`

it IS the logic of the STATISITCS you are using to MAKE your argument

MA, you DO know that I can block you too, right? I **also** have the ability to silence you at will.