Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 683480343294378041
if you have more than 6 degrees of freedom, you don't have any meaningful correlation
Every tuesday, a person of a particular race dies. Every tuesday, every person of that race engages in a certain activity.
that doesn't mean that activity kills people
if the sampling is big enough, you'll get the same correlation via just random chance
Bayesian Mathematics
english not your first language?
please read the above
my third
`if the sampling is big enough, you'll get the same correlation via just random chance` but this is still nonsense
the bigger the sampling the more precise the statistics
a hypothesis must be tested or it's just speculation. a proper scientific test has exactly ONE control variable and ONE test variable
a statistical analysis performed on a set of people which cannot be adequately randomized yields no meaningful data. it's like trying to say that being born on Tuesday reduces your average lifespan because of all the people that ever existed that were born on Tuesday, that day had the lowest avg life expectancy
post memes
@shmutz by your same numbers, one can say that BECAUSE people are being violent, they have less TIME to mate as well as fewer oppurtunties to be alone without endagering their lives
correlations go both ways
@ManAnimal but you seem to argue that there's no effects of an uneven distribution of men to women which would be a dubious claim, especially when statistics indicate that this factor at least partially plays a role
no, i am arguing that your data doesn't allow for one to draw any meaningful conclusions because it's a simple matter of scope
`by your same numbers, one can say that BECAUSE people are being violent, they have less TIME to mate as well as fewer oppurtunties to be alone without endagering their lives` lol that makes little sense since you can't argue that there's less women than men in china because of an increase of violence
I can’t watch that. Obese people make me sick
what you call 'a partial role' has an EQUAL chance of being : 1) the result for the inverse application of your interpretation 2) the result of sampling one circumstance more often than another or 3) random chance
the phrase 'a partial role' implies that factorA is KNOW to be a function of factorB ie. f(A) =b^2+ x
but f(A) = b^2+x is NOT equivalent to f(B) = a^2 + x
Get this math shit outta the meme channel
get your life out of this reality
Good one
that one-liner was cringe, MA
lore, you are so low IQ if you cringe, it's complement
Cringing is a natural action though