Message from @SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck

Discord ID: 678980934980075531


2020-02-17 15:04:52 UTC  

Best thing about unemployment is knowing that people like Coolitic pay for my welfare. <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2020-02-17 15:04:52 UTC  

Their behavior is that different in Somalia than Detroit?

2020-02-17 15:05:35 UTC  

No, because welfare

2020-02-17 15:05:49 UTC  

Their behaviour *was* extremely different before welfare in America

2020-02-17 15:05:58 UTC  

Muh socialism cringe

2020-02-17 15:06:15 UTC  

Welfare makes it so that you devolve into third world habits

2020-02-17 15:06:23 UTC  

So you are quite literally proving my pt

2020-02-17 15:06:29 UTC  

Yeah but was it the welfare that made them bad or desegregation?

2020-02-17 15:06:30 UTC  

Welfare only exasperates already-existing behaviors

2020-02-17 15:06:31 UTC  

Rofl

2020-02-17 15:06:34 UTC  

"If we just end all welfare, including for white people. The niggers will magically behave again!"

-Coolitic 2020

2020-02-17 15:06:51 UTC  

ending welfare might help a LITTLE bit, but at the end of the day....

2020-02-17 15:06:55 UTC  

Dessegregation is an entirely different topic

2020-02-17 15:07:05 UTC  

Ok yeah I’ll drop it

2020-02-17 15:07:05 UTC  

I think it's De-Segregation

2020-02-17 15:07:16 UTC  

Fuck off grammar Nazi

2020-02-17 15:07:22 UTC  

I'm German, yes.

2020-02-17 15:07:24 UTC  

Bash the grammar Fash

2020-02-17 15:07:35 UTC  

okay, gayboi

2020-02-17 15:07:39 UTC  

Lol

2020-02-17 15:07:49 UTC  

....I doubt it will fully solve the problem

2020-02-17 15:07:59 UTC  

Grammar nazis prefer the company of gentlemen

2020-02-17 15:08:09 UTC  

Simple as, letting poor people suffer on their own for their own actions is how you improve everything

2020-02-17 15:08:22 UTC  

On one hand, ending welfare or even going Yang's route by awarding a lump sum may eliminate the dependency and incentive to stay within the poverty line.

2020-02-17 15:08:22 UTC  

Reap what you sow

2020-02-17 15:08:51 UTC  

Some communities just have different standards for how low they’re willing to go

2020-02-17 15:08:54 UTC  

On the other, I expect the children would suffer immensely based on the poor spending habits and decisions of the parents.

2020-02-17 15:09:00 UTC  

Or maybe a cap at how high they go

2020-02-17 15:09:04 UTC  

Having a "minimum welfare" is achieved with capitalism

2020-02-17 15:09:24 UTC  

Reducing scarcity is the only way it is fixed

2020-02-17 15:09:49 UTC  

Any1 saying otherwise is a welfare cuck that needs real life to smack em in the face

2020-02-17 15:10:52 UTC  

The problem is that awarding welfare based on a certain income creates an environment in which families actively discourage their kids from achievement to preserve that steady rate of income.

2020-02-17 15:11:17 UTC  

Given that black income was almost equivalent to whites before welfare

2020-02-17 15:11:22 UTC  

Kind of proves my pt

2020-02-17 15:11:49 UTC  

And dont give me BS about "it only affected blacks" when welfare was explicitly targeted towards blacks

2020-02-17 15:12:20 UTC  

As per the campaign agendas of the time

2020-02-17 15:12:39 UTC  

Because Democrats were viewed as racist, and so they wanted the black vote

2020-02-17 15:12:44 UTC  

I have a dog on my shirt

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/678530619621507073/678982167740678184/image0.jpg

2020-02-17 15:12:52 UTC  

But these people are under the poverty line for a reason. Giving them full liberty to spend their stipend without restriction would be disastrous.

2020-02-17 15:13:06 UTC  

Simply funneling money to the impoverished doesn't fix poverty.