7.62 soviet

WRONG

anything else is for <:vagina:337114618981777409>

COMMIES MUST BE PURGED

@KyonJ Political ideologies in sp ed

You will die from .22 long just as much as from any other caliber if it hits you in the vitals

Dats rite @Son of Rome

I’d prefer an AUG, but that’s because I was trained with an AUG. You yanks are gonna prefer your m4s. Eastern euros are gonna prefer their AKs. Chinese are gonna prefer chicken dim sims.
It’s a toolbox.

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

556 is plenty good, you're unlikely to engage beyond 300m anyways

@Uksio keeps .25 auto in his nightstand

Depends on the terrain

That whole caliber debate is not worth it.
5.56 will kill you and the person behind you

I can tell

Depends on the war

7.62 is for people who know how to handle recoil

@Son of Rome you keep your balls in the nightstand.

A bullet is a bullet

Window

7.62 is for operator fags

Again Idc about the firearm or the ammo

.308 is for alpha males

listened to the debate, bernie started talking about the coronavirus outbreak. someone started coughing right after

@Son of Rome Nah, I only ever owned a Makarov in its weird 9mm version

you got that adrenaline pumping and shits crackin all around you the last thing you want is a big heavy round thats gonna fuck with your sight picture

Because fuck you, the tree youre hiding behind and your buddy behind you

762>308>557

556

It's like your opinion, man

nah fuck it ill hit with my 357 henry like a hemmingway chad

Lol Canada is like CA just more French

44-40 from under my horse like John Wayne

.357 is a rather neato caliber tbh

Vietnam and Korea the fighting was fairly close range.
Gulf wars fighting was a lot longer range.
Afghanistan the ranges were long enough that the Aussies were considering making the mag-58 a section-level weapon.

It all really depends, dude.

Get refuted

357 henry repeaters are range toys

so fun

God be like "Omae wa mou shindeiru" and isn't wrong.

@Son of Rome

@Son of Rome just use adblocker faggot