@Samaritan™ Well it goes over why some racial legislation is eugenic in the 2nd example of the article

never saw eugenic used as an adverb

The 1964 "civil rights" act forces miscegenation and "affirmative action" weaponizes hypergamy

> you can only push people so much before anger takes over, can only make them afraid so much before they panic
I've argued this point and people are expectant that no matter what I do not break and I am in the wrong if I do even if I am remarkably tolerant for a long long time preceding

@ManAnimal Not sure I have either tbh

Works fine though

not sure i understand what you m ean @Samaritan™

I break quickly

I don’t like it

I'll read the forced miscegenation part

Here, I'll just lift the section on America and paste it here

@phadreus whats your pfp

Is that a yes tradwife?

@ManAnimal I'm not so much as making an argument as complaining about being held to an impossible standard, lol

ah, i hear you

been there... SO many times

• American psychoeugenics and neoeugenics; The invasion of American cities and disintegration of white communities enabled by the 1964 Civil rights act (Kennedy), "Affirmative action" executive order 11246 and hart-celler act (1965-1967)(LBJ), has resulted in mass civil conflict and racial unrest in the United States. These systems of systematic societal oppression and 2nd party applied eugenics have enabled the mass power exchange between men/women and white/minority populations where, under a meritocractic system, such power exchange would not have occurred. This has proceeded in the(likely planned) decline of white population growth as, specifically, white men, and, secondly(and far less significantly) white women, are hampered in self determination- manifest destiny- and prevented from achieving significant societal status. The decline of white birthrates has resulted as a cost proceeding from a lesser- but not insignificant- trend of interracial hypergamy, as fallout of affirmative action and the mass promotion of minority populations- economically and socially- through blatant discrimination by both employers and scholastic institutions; as well as a forced government regulated "acceptance" of minority populations in previously white only communities. These factors combined with the widespread societal acceptance of fetacide- achieved through the gynosupremacist rowvswade legislation of 1973- have resulted in mass depopulation-or stagnation- of multiple American ethnicities, as well as an underlying tension bordering on racialized/gendered warfare. This psychological and eugenic(often called dysgenic) warfare waged against the American populace has resulted in the decline of American society, has caused mass violence and, potentially, will cause Civil War. (likely that- much like the previous example of eugenic fallout in China- American mass killings are, largely, caused by this phenomenon)

Its really annoying because the bar doesn't stop raising

@Samaritan™, frankly it's a BIG reason that neither the center nor the right can communicate with the Left. They don't understand that if one does NOT speak with emphasis, if one does NOT get angry, if one just IGNORES a challenge... they LOSE

each applies his own standard as if it's a universal when in reality, the rules of the otherside are inverted

@Cryrosphere It's a yes metal dude

Sorta looks like me

Depends on what you are trying to archive by speaking to them

it used to be, when we were forced to interact in person, the intellectuals had to concede and learn to negotiate with both the emotional left and the physical right

Muh civil war

That's still true to some degree

**Just not on the internet**

Which has run off into the real world

the rules are inverted in that if you are in a debate hall of rational authorites, if a person is emotional, you turn your back on them

BUT if you turn your back on an emotional lefty in a street brawl, you're libel to get a knife in your back

those rules DO NOT apply

Its like how Warski and Francesca were polite in the real world and than she went and stabbed him in the back right after, bad example but this is all I've got lol

That has to do with setting

you don't look like the calm adult; you look like the coward

they win

you lose

not the other way around

The problem with twitter is that they block anyone outside of their echo chamber so they aren't appealing to the reasonable audience like a debate

and the POINT is to win their followers to YOUR side

not cow-tow to people that ALREADY agree with you

Before us, lies Germany.
Within us, Germany is stirring.
Behind us, Germany is following.