Message from @phadreus
Discord ID: 683520070697091089
Oh, and plus.. That was posted in a fascist group and will probably mostly be read by fascists on Minds
Emotion tends to preside first but just because its the trend doesn't mean that it shouldn't be moved more one way or another
well, emotion presides FIRST with all of us
Though I more so advocate for integration of both rather than becoming utilitarian rationalists
if you don't realize this, then you've never had to leave your safe space
and you are entitled
You cannot steer the ship 100% of the time
you can only push people so much before anger takes over, can only make them afraid so much before they panic
then emotion takes over.. period
no one is immune to this
@Samaritan™ Well it goes over why some racial legislation is eugenic in the 2nd example of the article
never saw eugenic used as an adverb
The 1964 "civil rights" act forces miscegenation and "affirmative action" weaponizes hypergamy
> you can only push people so much before anger takes over, can only make them afraid so much before they panic
I've argued this point and people are expectant that no matter what I do not break and I am in the wrong if I do even if I am remarkably tolerant for a long long time preceding
@ManAnimal Not sure I have either tbh
Works fine though
not sure i understand what you m ean @Samaritan™
I break quickly
I don’t like it
I'll read the forced miscegenation part
@phadreus whats your pfp
Is that a yes tradwife?
@ManAnimal I'm not so much as making an argument as complaining about being held to an impossible standard, lol
ah, i hear you
been there... SO many times
• American psychoeugenics and neoeugenics; The invasion of American cities and disintegration of white communities enabled by the 1964 Civil rights act (Kennedy), "Affirmative action" executive order 11246 and hart-celler act (1965-1967)(LBJ), has resulted in mass civil conflict and racial unrest in the United States. These systems of systematic societal oppression and 2nd party applied eugenics have enabled the mass power exchange between men/women and white/minority populations where, under a meritocractic system, such power exchange would not have occurred. This has proceeded in the(likely planned) decline of white population growth as, specifically, white men, and, secondly(and far less significantly) white women, are hampered in self determination- manifest destiny- and prevented from achieving significant societal status. The decline of white birthrates has resulted as a cost proceeding from a lesser- but not insignificant- trend of interracial hypergamy, as fallout of affirmative action and the mass promotion of minority populations- economically and socially- through blatant discrimination by both employers and scholastic institutions; as well as a forced government regulated "acceptance" of minority populations in previously white only communities. These factors combined with the widespread societal acceptance of fetacide- achieved through the gynosupremacist rowvswade legislation of 1973- have resulted in mass depopulation-or stagnation- of multiple American ethnicities, as well as an underlying tension bordering on racialized/gendered warfare. This psychological and eugenic(often called dysgenic) warfare waged against the American populace has resulted in the decline of American society, has caused mass violence and, potentially, will cause Civil War. (likely that- much like the previous example of eugenic fallout in China- American mass killings are, largely, caused by this phenomenon)
Its really annoying because the bar doesn't stop raising
@Samaritan™, frankly it's a BIG reason that neither the center nor the right can communicate with the Left. They don't understand that if one does NOT speak with emphasis, if one does NOT get angry, if one just IGNORES a challenge... they LOSE
each applies his own standard as if it's a universal when in reality, the rules of the otherside are inverted
@Cryrosphere It's a yes metal dude
Sorta looks like me
Depends on what you are trying to archive by speaking to them
it used to be, when we were forced to interact in person, the intellectuals had to concede and learn to negotiate with both the emotional left and the physical right
Muh civil war
That's still true to some degree
**Just not on the internet**
Which has run off into the real world
the rules are inverted in that if you are in a debate hall of rational authorites, if a person is emotional, you turn your back on them
BUT if you turn your back on an emotional lefty in a street brawl, you're libel to get a knife in your back
those rules DO NOT apply