Message from @phadreus
Discord ID: 683535952341368965
My dad used to beat my ass for fighting bullies though, so bad context
That's the problem with the right they don't try and undo everything the left has done
It isn't ideal but it needs to happen at least in places like the UK
how profitable can any company be when everyone and anyone thinks they know a better way of how things should be done despite not understanding the requirments?
lack of authority leads to lack of efficency
it's why the best ruler is a benevolant king
monarchy is a system of ruling
like democracy
and the WORST ruler is a malevolent king
or dictatorship
minarchism is what you tax things for
efficency isn't always good
Monarchy cannot exist without the culture that supports it, I do not unerstand monarchists that don't come from countries that already have that culture
who is a benevolant king in your eyes MA?
maybe read up a lil https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night-watchman_state
ineffiency of gov isn't a bug; it's a FEATURE of having 3 branches balance each other
Minarchy is also a system of rulership, one featuring small central government and extremely lax economic regulations
same is true with State's rights
what's your standard?
It would be a feature if both sides didn't share vested interest
```whose state's only functions are to act as an enforcer of the non-aggression principle by providing its citizens with the military, the police and courts, thereby protecting them from aggression, theft, breach of contract, fraud and enforcing property laws. 19th-century Britain has been described by historian Charles Townshend as a standard-bearer of this form of government among Western countries.```
The globalists
central power has *nothing* to do with minarchism
You cannot have both a minarchist government and an oligarchy
nothing *at all*
yes you can
I suppose the founders couldn;t have accounted for that one
That's Just not a thing
what is more efficent? having each state gov a dept for each function? or centralizing all those functions on the federal level?
you're retarded
the more you hyper-focus on efficency, the more the authority becomes centralized
you can have a minarchist dictatorship
because the decision-making arm is not *at all* defined under minarchism
That's as ridiculous as something like "anarcho-socialism" lol
It barely even makes sense
anarcho-socialism is the same as anarcho-capitalism
they are both just anarchy
words don't matter as much as concepts