i never said that

i said your system would be inferior not impossible

No no I get that

but how would your system maintain the value of products if ever user has their own means of production?

not everyone produces the same thing

without labor how would one accumulate currency to begin with?

im not a communist

I mean without working how would someone earn a wage to earn start a transaction in such a future where everybody has a means of production?

a cycle would start

there would be initial investments into the automation then it would just switch hands and receive improvements from there

If anything completion limits innovation

Competition

So everyone has a means of production and everyone can transfer their goods for currency

yep

this currency can be used to purchase goods from others

You need to produce profit

yep

Which means you need to cut innovation

why would this be needed post scarcity if anybody could just make the same product?

Tech could be better but you need to factor in costs

Innovating too rapidly will put you in hot water

I kinda need to rest rn, could we continue later Reaper?

You just get cut by older cheaper products

sure

Thank you for questioning my beliefs

I really appreciate this

no problem thanks for not insulting me

Why would I? 😂

thats what every single communist who has joined has done

I was an Ancap once and I'm not an unethical marxist leninist type either 😂

Anyway ttyl m8

I only insult @SHEPARD D☭G

@ʀeaper try not being an idiot then?

It's not an insult if it's true

at that Point its just pointing out the obvious

@SHEPARD D☭G

@Phobia advice is not meant to be an argument

New proposal

Everyone starts off with 1 million dollars

And are penalised for all the work they do not do

Have you calculated one million times the population of America yet?

🤔

Ok I hear