and it's not 'stop this group from hoarding'

it's more construct a society where hoarding isn't necessary as goods are devalued

same with money, the reason the 1% have so much is because they make it year after year for their own wants. if you take it they will stop producing it because there is no point, working to the lowest speed to maintain your life with no room to improve

Right and what about worker co-ops?

do worker co-ops involve stealing from bosses?

im searching it now but im not familiar with worker co-ops

It's a business where the workers are also the owners of the business

a popular example is the mondragon corporation

all profit from the business goes back to the workers and to investment

rather than to a owner

who then delegates a portion of his profits to the workers

The point is i'm not trying to steal, but I'm trying to do what worker co-ops do: build the infrastructure to make it such that it is unnecessary to have a boss. In this case it is unnecessary to hoard

I'm a voluntaryist so I would never coerce someone to take their property and redistribute it

back, i was reading this: https://canadianworker.coop/about/what-is-a-worker-co-op/

There are different models of worker co-ops but they all have one thing in common which is removing the need for the singular owner role

my problem with that is it easily becomes bloated and stagnant, even on small scales, you see this with any small town. If someone has the ability to make and run an empire they should have the right to do so. This for me falls on the side if me wanting more individual freedom. Less limitations to a person the better so long as it doesnt hamper the same or safety of another

people can from the pooled resources in a post-scarcity society

but this is assuming post-scarcity

It's not that I want to restrict currency or purchasing, I just want to build a platform where it would be unnecessary and counter-productive to do so

but if someone owns them then its not post, you still have to trade in some way to obtain what somone else has

by forcing limitations on something you are restricting it

right and hoarding is unnecessary if such action prevents yourself from gaining from a shared pool

such behaviour can be repressed in the same way gifting is repressed in a market economy

its like saying "you have free speech but we will fine you for using it" its not free

How am I fining?

example

It's like saying: I have my property and you have to abide by my rules if you want to be on my property

is that not in accordance with property rights?

Inaction is not fining

social ostracism is an effective means of utilising collectives in a way that is not unethical

its no different than the ancaps that preach of the ancap and then argue that shooting someone in your lawn may cause your community to disassociate yourself from such cruelty if they see fit

It's like saying shutting my ears or not giving you good treatment for what you said is the same as silencing you

by artificially making it harder to do x you are limiting x
The pure capitalism works the way it is because of human nature, if you alter it to make it harder to run a company on your own thats an artificial limitation and its no longer free

Lol

It doesn't have to be and it really isn't

Capitalism has had many different iterations

pure capitalism is anarchy

Anarchy has many flavours

and a voluntary society takes many forms

Pure communism is freedom, Freedom from coercion, Freedom from force, Freedom to associate, Freedom from class and material slavery. By nullifying the value of property we can truly experience our subjective value of it.

anarcho-capitalism isnt anarchy, by having a set of morals the public follow and punish for breaking its not anarchy. There are diffrent amounts of anarchy in a system but anything other than the strong eating the weak its not anarchy