Lmao

Well actually your example is hilarious because I grew up in Utah and was raised Mormon and their Christianity is so different it may as well be a start to a new category all its own

Down to little details like the fact that Eve was supposed to eat the apple and this was a good thing, to big things like the fact there are infinite gods with infinite worlds

The god of our earth having the biblical name, jesus being his literal son, satan going to war with god, and the planet god lives on being named Kolob

So yeah, they're pretty wack

Doth protest too much

Yo

So i guess we can say mormonism to christianity is kind of like stalism/tankieism to marxism...

@CTeso based and redpilled

@everyone

In a way that's true Airwolf. Stalinism, or properly Marxism Leninism, still has some of the DNA of Marx in there and it came about from a proper Marxist revolution. It however mutated into it's own new thing, trotskyism is similar in this regard also bearing the same issues while pretending to be opposed to Stalinism

I an the ultimate redpilled autistic neet woman

Bow before me incels

Degeneracy

@CTeso i would but im the ultimate redpilled autistic man with a strong hatred for statist oligarchs and their culturally degerate entitled solipsistic useful idiots

Im not sure what im supposed to put here besides cucks destroy families and societies and antifa bullies should get massacred by every self respecting working man and woman anywhere, multiple times 😉

Hot

Dom me daddy

<:AstyAhegao:532555773704929281>

Sell my booty on your agorist hustle

Even though im more of a paleo-lib if i need to fight tooth and nail (against bikes locks and milkshakes for the small price of an eye socket) for the greater good I will, but <:yee:515566642638618625>

Degeneracy

🅱egeneracy

I like her

Based and redpilled

God these lot are insufferable

I remember when people would ask questions rather than be so brutish about pretending

<#492157527123951618>

Assuming we're pretending? @unwoundtoast

Not you.

I linked the channel for specificity

Unless of course you agree that a man is obliged to his job relentlessly and holds no freedom of association

In that case I’ll reiterate

Do you enjoy strawmanning? Or are you incapable of reading

It was without question I said he voluntarily chose it and if he doesn't like the conditions he can quit and find a new job

Yeah i wasnt talking about a contractual obligation as i was talking about a moral/ethical one, of course of which ill probsbly always voluntarily agree to

Contractual obligations unless morally and ethically based are obviously more subjective in their significance ofc

If he does the work voluntarily, he is not obliged to do the work for any given man

Yeah he can quit

You cannot both claim that he can change jobs if he doesn’t want to serve a man and that he is obliged to the man

What prevents him from quitting then serving others?

It’s absurd