Message from @ThatPreciseBloke
Discord ID: 602603718931775494
So i guess we can say mormonism to christianity is kind of like stalism/tankieism to marxism...
@everyone
In a way that's true Airwolf. Stalinism, or properly Marxism Leninism, still has some of the DNA of Marx in there and it came about from a proper Marxist revolution. It however mutated into it's own new thing, trotskyism is similar in this regard also bearing the same issues while pretending to be opposed to Stalinism
I an the ultimate redpilled autistic neet woman
Bow before me incels
Degeneracy
@CTeso i would but im the ultimate redpilled autistic man with a strong hatred for statist oligarchs and their culturally degerate entitled solipsistic useful idiots
Im not sure what im supposed to put here besides cucks destroy families and societies and antifa bullies should get massacred by every self respecting working man and woman anywhere, multiple times 😉
Hot
Dom me daddy
<:AstyAhegao:532555773704929281>
Sell my booty on your agorist hustle
Even though im more of a paleo-lib if i need to fight tooth and nail (against bikes locks and milkshakes for the small price of an eye socket) for the greater good I will, but <:yee:515566642638618625>
Degeneracy
🅱egeneracy
I like her
Based and redpilled
God these lot are insufferable
I remember when people would ask questions rather than be so brutish about pretending
<#492157527123951618>
Not you.
I linked the channel for specificity
Unless of course you agree that a man is obliged to his job relentlessly and holds no freedom of association
In that case I’ll reiterate
Do you enjoy strawmanning? Or are you incapable of reading
It was without question I said he voluntarily chose it and if he doesn't like the conditions he can quit and find a new job
Yeah i wasnt talking about a contractual obligation as i was talking about a moral/ethical one, of course of which ill probsbly always voluntarily agree to
Contractual obligations unless morally and ethically based are obviously more subjective in their significance ofc
If he does the work voluntarily, he is not obliged to do the work for any given man
Yeah he can quit
You cannot both claim that he can change jobs if he doesn’t want to serve a man and that he is obliged to the man
What prevents him from quitting then serving others?
It’s absurd
Bruh, if he don't wanna do it he can quit simple
This is the beauty of capitalism
You fundamentally misunderstand the point. If he can quit at any point and continue working at any point, then even your posit holds that he has the freedom to associate with whomever he pleases
Ergo there is no reason he cannot simply deny services
Yeah, exactly, if he don't like it he can quit
It’s not simply a matter of quitting
Why not?
How many times need I repeat myself?