Message from @Anastasia

Discord ID: 630304191914704896


2019-10-06 07:19:34 UTC  

If I murder a man under the name of god, that does not make god a murderer

2019-10-06 07:19:47 UTC  

Show me where I consented.

2019-10-06 07:19:47 UTC  

Do you understand?

2019-10-06 07:19:54 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/492157062797590531/630303204969807872/unknown.png

2019-10-06 07:19:58 UTC  

Murder isn't discord.

2019-10-06 07:20:05 UTC  

Discord isn't murder.

2019-10-06 07:20:12 UTC  
2019-10-06 07:20:14 UTC  

I prefer to stick to the facts at hand.

2019-10-06 07:20:37 UTC  

Unless were talking about murder, I see no reason to talk about murder.

2019-10-06 07:20:43 UTC  

If you fail to understand my point then I can restate it

2019-10-06 07:21:38 UTC  

Unless your point has something to do with discord, I don't see the relevance.

2019-10-06 07:21:53 UTC  

Subject matter, and all that.

2019-10-06 07:21:55 UTC  

It is fallacious to conflate the very idea of or actions of implicit consent *itself* with the bindings of the state or other similar actions taken under the guise of legitimacy via implicit consent

2019-10-06 07:22:19 UTC  

Yet you're trying to conflate murder with discord. But that's collateral

2019-10-06 07:22:39 UTC  

Do you understand why I hold such a posit?

2019-10-06 07:22:58 UTC  

Implicit consent is what statists use to exert coercion over people.

2019-10-06 07:23:16 UTC  

But, implicit consent is an assumption that one agrees to the rules.

2019-10-06 07:23:32 UTC  

Whether they use it to grant them legitimacy or not has no effect on whether implicit consent *itself* is or isn’t coercive

2019-10-06 07:23:33 UTC  

It is impossible to prove factually

2019-10-06 07:23:41 UTC  

Whether they use it to grant them legitimacy or not has no effect on whether implicit consent *itself* is or isn’t coercive

2019-10-06 07:23:49 UTC  

And does not allow one to not agree to the rules.

2019-10-06 07:23:53 UTC  

Whether they use it to grant them legitimacy or not has no effect on whether implicit consent *itself* is or isn’t coercive

2019-10-06 07:24:27 UTC  

>Agrees to rules in order to make Discord account
>Gets banned from several servers for being an absolute twat
>***I'M BEING OPPRESSED***

2019-10-06 07:24:34 UTC  

@Phobia fuck off

2019-10-06 07:24:43 UTC  

No.

2019-10-06 07:24:55 UTC  

Let him have his fun @unwoundtoast

2019-10-06 07:24:59 UTC  

Why?

2019-10-06 07:25:00 UTC  

I'd recommend speaking to people here with a tad bit more respect

2019-10-06 07:25:04 UTC  

No

2019-10-06 07:25:13 UTC  

@Phobia I respect those I choose to respect

2019-10-06 07:25:16 UTC  

You are not one

2019-10-06 07:25:18 UTC  

Fuck yourself

2019-10-06 07:25:35 UTC  

So be it.

2019-10-06 07:25:56 UTC  

👍 👍 👍

2019-10-06 07:25:58 UTC  

The only way to enforce implicit rules is by coercion, simply because the one being involuntarily imposed upon didnt explicitly agree to rules.

2019-10-06 07:26:15 UTC  

@Anastasia the enforcement of implicit consent is not implicit consent itself

2019-10-06 07:26:28 UTC  

Whether they use it to grant them legitimacy or not has no effect on whether implicit consent *itself* is or isn’t coercive

2019-10-06 07:26:38 UTC  

Time to order an inordinate number of dildos for toast to give to people when he wants them to go fuck themselves...

2019-10-06 07:26:45 UTC  

Please

2019-10-06 07:26:47 UTC  

Jeff Bezos will be happy

2019-10-06 07:26:54 UTC  

@T3CHN01200 make this quicker