https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVHFmVccWns

@Mintmaru video unavailable

<:fry:550907996163670017>

It works for me

Basically about thing that Chinese govt lied about Coronavirus

@ʀeaper iposted it earlier in memes and autism apparently

should work for you there

I had a jewish family tip me $6.66 today at work

> govt
> lying

LOL WHO WOULD'VE THOUGHT

https://i.redd.it/jb7z1ywwiif41.jpg

I'm just wondering

would ancaps actually defend this?

Probably

Yes yes I would

Support a duopoly? Nah id make my own soft drink, invent the billboards, and associate my invention with the soft drink to not only promote said invention but also my new soft drink company and newly invented ad space <:Ancap_Smiley:538150164800733204> 🔥 👌 💯

Y’all are thinking small time

Patent space ads

Ez

Intellectual property is theft, commie.

Yep, also (intellectual property is inherently) uncompetitive and thus in violation of the nap

It’s competitive
Now companies will have to meet my patent by buying the rights to children and making them ad slaves

Also technically the NAP is a violation of the NAP

So....

<:Siberia:583869458100125696>

> Now companies will have to meet my patent by buying the rights to children and making them ad slaves

Were speaking of intellectual property, not ethics and/or individuals (fallacy of equivocation btw) ... The existance of Intellectual property laws implies the collectivist material enforcement upon individual usage of media or content by way of force, which violates the NAP

> Also technically the NAP is a violation of the NAP

How is a principle designed to dissuade antagonistic acts inheirently antagonistic?

Because the NAP requires collectivist enforcement to enact said principles

If it doesn’t then who’s to stop me anyways

Anyone who wants to.

There is a degree of reciprocity concerning ethical dilemmas

Anyone?
A person versus a multinational company?

<:Dank_Jerry:535638004669087747>

If you fundamentally treat yourself as an exception to the ethical rule, why is it inconsistent for others to treat you thus?

I didn’t say I was
I was pointing out that there are exceptions being made

Then they are either incorrect or unethical.

That’s not the case
I wouldn’t say it’s as clear cut as that

Competition has nothing to do with ethical principle, it’s a pragmatic matter

True

Both of you are retarded.

Well so are you for trying to inject reason into this

I’m not going to apologize for being correct

You didn’t even say anything that’s worthy of being correct or incorrect