Message from @unwoundtoast
Discord ID: 677616808982872075
Y’all are thinking small time
Patent space ads
Ez
Intellectual property is theft, commie.
Yep, also (intellectual property is inherently) uncompetitive and thus in violation of the nap
It’s competitive
Now companies will have to meet my patent by buying the rights to children and making them ad slaves
Also technically the NAP is a violation of the NAP
So....
<:Siberia:583869458100125696>
> Now companies will have to meet my patent by buying the rights to children and making them ad slaves
Were speaking of intellectual property, not ethics and/or individuals (fallacy of equivocation btw) ... The existance of Intellectual property laws implies the collectivist material enforcement upon individual usage of media or content by way of force, which violates the NAP
> Also technically the NAP is a violation of the NAP
How is a principle designed to dissuade antagonistic acts inheirently antagonistic?
Because the NAP requires collectivist enforcement to enact said principles
If it doesn’t then who’s to stop me anyways
Anyone who wants to.
There is a degree of reciprocity concerning ethical dilemmas
Anyone?
A person versus a multinational company?
<:Dank_Jerry:535638004669087747>
If you fundamentally treat yourself as an exception to the ethical rule, why is it inconsistent for others to treat you thus?
I didn’t say I was
I was pointing out that there are exceptions being made
Then they are either incorrect or unethical.
That’s not the case
I wouldn’t say it’s as clear cut as that
True
Both of you are retarded.
Well so are you for trying to inject reason into this
I’m not going to apologize for being correct
You didn’t even say anything that’s worthy of being correct or incorrect
You just pointed out a few things from an autistic convo
Then you didn’t just address my claim?
Clearly you’re not here to reason
Yea
You admitted as much yourself
Yea
If such is the case, you’re not having a conversation
You’re making a mockery of one. It’s a show.
Incorrect
I’m having an idle conversation
No it isn’t
Not a mockery but a meme
<:thinking:505872050225807390>
That’s synonymous moron
Mockery implies a facade
I’m merely laughing already
Pretending to have a conversation is not a conversation