Hm, I don't think that deserves a snarky comment or a sarcastic remark. Thanks for posting the source this time.

Claims that gay parents are just as capable of raising children as straight parents are misrepresented. Source: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657413

Go to <#373860833475690508> for more

You do know that just putting yourself on a fake high horse after a small discussion is pretty cringy, right?

Its not fake.

Really? So you're genuinely above than me as a human being because you refused a simple request and escalated it to straw man and petty insulting?

Impressive, you are truly deserving of that horse.

Correction, you didn't refuse it. You actively dodged it.

Alright, enough of that, boys.

How do you find the tons of sources regarding homosexuals and their deleterious behaviour?

I know a guy

Yes, Really.

No, I mean

How do you find = what do you think of it

My question was directed at @Sterling

I haven't checked them, honestly.

I have no interest in them at the time, and I'd rather not force myself to read something I'm not interested in.

I'll just tell you, most people odnt know, because in most cities there isnt a large fag population, but if you've lived in a large enough city they have develop a large sub-culture, and you meet them and they talk about - it just makes you understand how disgusting their behavior is. All of those studies understate how maliciously dangerous they are.

They dont care, they want to die, they want to destroy, they want to get aids, they want to just be disgusting

You should educate yourself beyond matters that appeal to you. You'll never grow much that way.

While having the best nails.

and prettiest hair cuts and bodies

its the psychology

Read the articles, lad.

Read them.

Knowledge retention is awful when it comes to a subject that the person is not interested in.

gross on the inside to they present and pristine as possible on the outside.

I'll forget them the next day.

Bullwhip theres a thing called burden of proof

If you make a claim you have to provide evidence and the sources

When your claim is challenged

And consodering you jad easier access and knowledge of an article you could have been kind to provide it in the forst place. I see its all resolved now anyways, thanks mr squeaky for providing it.

Kudos to you

>provide then dozens of proofs
>lmao i wont read them ill just forget tomorrow anywayz xD

I'm starting to think I speak some kind of extremely advanced English that only I comprehend.

I didn't want proofs for anything. I wanted him to provide the study that confirmed his statement and to understand why it's done.

It's not quantum physics or anything overly complex.

Just "provide everything that supports your statement without people needing to ask for it".

Say a person claims vaccines cause autism. They just do that, and pull the "just search it lmao" card when someone asks for the article or study they read to reach this conclusion.

How many articles on this subject are there? How do I know which one was the one he looked at?

Besides that, it's etiquette.