Praeceptor (Discord ID: 245824814051360769), page 1
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
121 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
how the hell did they allow him to shoot this
my wife is radibly misogynistic, it scares me sometimes
don't get me wrong, i'm all for disliking women in general, but she takes it too far
yeah, women make up of over half the world's population
you can always delude yourself into thinking you're an exception
mind you that any score below 9/10 will get you shot
tu eres la frontera ahora, gringo
today it's american whining day
too american to be of any worth
Fish is poisoned, meat is full of hormones, plastic makes your balls shrink, vegetables are sprinkled with pesticide
Basically don't eat anything ever
You want edge? How about this one: Homosexuals are mentally ill people and should either seek treatment or be executed if they ever acted upon it.
There's more: Their bodies shouldn't be harvested for organs, as they are stained with immorality.
Alright, enough of that, boys.
How do you find the tons of sources regarding homosexuals and their deleterious behaviour?
How do you find = what do you think of it
My question was directed at @Sterling
You should educate yourself beyond matters that appeal to you. You'll never grow much that way.
>provide then dozens of proofs
>lmao i wont read them ill just forget tomorrow anywayz xD
that ain't the point, @Sterling you scrubo
after the shitty exchange you two had, he gave you several sources regarding homosexuals
when i asked you what you thought of it, you capped out with a similarly cheap tactic
so it's not like you're some kind of high rhetoric master and the other guy is some emotional beast
quite the gymnastics to just say "lmao whateverz"
>Also, pedophilia and homosexuality are different things (although that part you know) and it doesn't necessarily involve children of the opposite sex. I'd also believe that a homosexual pedophile (now that's something for the stories) would prefer little boys over little girls.
you claimed this, articles have been presented to disprove that
>The danger is not having non-heteros in a classroom, the danger is having them force LGBT propaganda down kid's throats.
would you rather be entertained than enlightened?
the absolute state of radical centrism
meanwhile the chinese don't give a shit about sjwry and the muslims treat women like objects
the west will be steamrolled if this goes on
nah, the future holds something far more grim
don't blacks have higher testosterone?
mmm that seems to be just conjecturing tbh
but in any case, if aromatase converts "excess" test into estradiol, what is the "excess" number? and what prevents it from being higher in blacks?
however, on an anecdotal note, i was required by my doctor to measure my test and it was above the normal levels, i remember being over 1000
it's perceptible, i'm hairy, gain muscle fast
but i never had any of the estradiol issues
i'd say that the 1070 cap is the real one then
we should also remember that african-americans were artificially selected during the slavery period, so the biggest and most resilient got to reproduce
just compare african-americans to the actual africans of the western african coast
the yoruba, which iirc is where most of the slaves were taken
@Sterling explain this pair of dogs
tfw you're trash jew and use niqqud
what towel? even the brits already wanted unconditional surrender, and the soviets were bloodthirsty to the end. hitler and the germans had only one option left: die fighting for germany, even though all was lost
you don't understand: once the tide was reversed, there was no "surrendering". there was no "aight lets end this fight, ill give you guys some stuff and let us keep our country". it was total war, it would only end with occupation. now, whether allied propaganda managed to completely change his image or not is a whole different thing. what we're talking about is that, once the war had begun, and especially after the setback in late 41 and early 42, there wasn't any "hanging the towel".
and in fact, the soviets were not only amped up by the conveniently-now-nationalistic propaganda, but also by having so many of their own killed. they wanted revenge, and that's natural. the point is that there was absolutely no room for this idea that "hitler should have sued for peace"
yeah, let's surrender and let them kill us in war camps like it happened
let's surrender and be sent to gulags
at least the europeans of then that fought to the end managed to keep their pride. what was left wasn't germany, isn't, and it's to be forgotten
nah, let's pretend our cowardice is being "rational" and "pragmatic"
>living to fight another day after the greatest conflict the world has ever seen, with your country obviously doomed to occupation and castration
are you thick or something, my man
do you think that any german soldier of the wehrmacht would have had a chance of "fighting another day"?
yeah, i'll take my dead pride over a living meek pragmatism any day
there are things more important than happiness
such as this alien concept to you, pride
it being the ultimate individualistic goal of an evolved ape doesn't make it the most important idea
all of your arguments could be used by the most debauched and degenerate of people
you might be misinforming them, then
you seem to have no grasp of the concepts whatsoever
the german people lost nothing. they fought for who they were
what was painted afterwards is just words to the wind
the BRD isn't germany, and any nationalist will tell you that
in any case, the UK won and are knee-deep in shit as well
if you consider the mere legislation saying something is the continuation of something else, then you're not only mad, but have a cattle mentality of most
you seem to not know the difference between a country and a nation
there is no problem. germany is gone.
people who live in germany and that love germany more than you love your mongrel nation have a higher authority on the matter to me, tbh
there was no "hanging the towel"
(the term being in fact throwing in the towel)
the geneva convention was AFTER the war, ass
the treaties that formed the convention as a document in international relations were signed in 49, to be added to the previous powerless ones
the two previous ones were as effective as the league of nations
and, in any case, they aren't respected by the big boys anyway
didn't the US have war camps for german prisoners after the war, despite the "geneva conventions", where millions died?
did the USSR not send millions to the gulags?
and still don't for the ones in power
"surrendering" in 1942 would have resulted in the same thing: occupation, war crimes
let me answer you with another simple question: do you prefer to die standing or live on your knees, ernesto?
as you failed to choose between one of the two, i'm going to take from your previous thoughts that you prefer the latter
again, going back to the original point
surrendering before may 45 would have made no difference, except for the fact that germany would have fewer heroes
but someone like you knows better
the young men back then were fighting for their blood and soil, to the bitter end, no matter what. there was no room for some 21st century mentality of "guys, let's surrender and then attack them in a generation or two, right?"
121 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.