Non-heteros seek to change sociology and religion - why are you denying that?

Fundementally Non-heteros arent having children

Pedophilia is how homosexuals replicate, grooming

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=kOB8NcSLv_Y

I read it at least three times back and forth and couldn't find something that proved your statement, so could you please point it to me in the article?

Also, pedophilia and homosexuality are different things (although that part you know) and it doesn't necessarily involve children of the opposite sex. I'd also believe that a homosexual pedophile (now that's something for the stories) would prefer little boys over little girls.

I'm not really denying anything yet, just questioning.

The article is based on a study.

How old are you?

A study that was not linked along with it.

And in those times that I looked through the article, I also didn't find a link to said study.

Thus it doesnt exist?

In honor of Millennial Woes to which Twitter banned today, a favorite speech:

"One Hour From Now"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIu-GTSqBKM

Wow.

I'm not even gonna bother continuing, honestly. You're just faking ignorance at this point.

"its not in LINKED in the article.....waaa"

Fine with me

@Sterling
Here's the study it was likely referring to, you are correct, it was not linked

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02607476.2017.1251103?journalCode=cjet20

Thank you, at least you understood what I was asking for.

Wait, @Deleted User It wasnt linked.....how on EARTH did you find it?

Finally someone with two braincells to rub together

It's bad journalism to bot cite sources
I looked it up
On a search engine

Not

Welcome to google.

If it was a broader topic, or a larger organization, it could've been much harder to find, but it's a small institute it seems

@Deleted User Dude, the time you spent dodging me asking for the article could have been used to actually link me the article and make a coffee. You even had a screenshot of it, how else do you get that if not from the article itself?

I spent no time on you.

Ouch, that edge just sliced my arm apart like a chainsaw.

You're lazy

You made the claim that a study proved it and dodged my request for said study.

Whatever, that naïveté is your problem, not mine. Just trying to give you a heads up.

You want edge? How about this one: Homosexuals are mentally ill people and should either seek treatment or be executed if they ever acted upon it.

That's like based Nippon steel folded over 1000 times.

There's more: Their bodies shouldn't be harvested for organs, as they are stained with immorality.

Are you passing out yet

I'm bleeding out here, it's slicing my body apart slash after slash.

My interest was not in the study, but in you providing all the information necessary without people having to ask.

When someone says "a study said X", they show the study.

Your interest was in getting me to do something for you. You failed.

so you whined.