Again, you presumptuous cunt, I've read Mussolini's Doctrine and 90% of Mosley's works.

Mosley had some really good points

And if that's good enough for you, then good for you.

Mussolini's book is pure politics, Fascism is not.

That's your own transposition of ideology onto what is a political vehicle.

Tell me again where the first futurist movements emerged? Mussolini's Italy? I don't agree with a social order that allows those sorts of things to exist.

I liked Mosley's approach on things.

Because you're ideologically possessed and transposing your own individualistic values onto the words and image of another. His approach to things amounted to preserving the British empire which is as Jewy as one can get.

Well, defense beats attack, in my opinion.

What does that even mean and how is that even vaguely related to what I said.

"Mosley had no problem with retaining India because defense is better"

btich, what?

Preserving the empire.

I often see people advocating for warmongering, conquest and other shit about wanting to follow war with more war.

Mosley seemed more concerned about securing his country's safety and stability.

"An army to defend your people, not attack others."

Mosley wanted to preserve the empire, Hitler trained Indians and created the Indian Legion to resist Jewry in India. 🤔

Hitler is still celebrated as a liberator in India today 🤔 🤔

Well, it's quite curious how some people deal with the whole "muh evil dictatorship" thing in different countries.

Here in Brazil, the '64 coup is basically hated by everyone, despite it being a move to save the country from the commie influence that the president was going to bring.

The military were not seen as liberators, but oppressors.

That explains your complexion.

Well, it's kind of "avoid fighting unecessary fights at all costs, but become a bloodthirsty machine when it's necessary".

The classic "there's a time and place for everything".

What I liked about Mosley was that he didn't seem to see war something the ordinary man should do because "hey, gotta spread the gospel", and instead an unfortunate event that would get his people killed.

If ive learned something during my online adventures its that, when someone says he read something i order to use it as an argument - he hasnt read shit

I have no idea what u guys have been discussing about but yea, nicr

Merry christmas

btw when someone say "i have phd in (insert here" they lose debates badly from. my experience

pretty much

i do not think, even having read something gives you any points in a debate

its reminiscent of muslims using quran as proof

interesting

i see it was my qustion that brought up this debate

thanks for sending stuff @Volkswächter#6867

seems he left

oh well

i still dont like marxes ideas, whether they were subverted or not by the kikes his shit was used as a tool

what everyone agrees on is that such an utopia is closer to a fairytale than to reality

no matter how nice he thought it would be, it can never work

so why should anyone praise a man for his economic knowledge if his answer to the problem doesnt work