Here's an interesting question. If, by the mechanisms and processes of Fascist/National Socialist doctrine; IE; the implementation of systems that simulate the conditions of life which allowed us to evolve, mankind naturally evolves into an a-sexual biological system where everyone is born with both sets of genitals, would this be bad or good?

You can't predict what 10,000 years of accelerated evolution will do to a people.

Marx hated the Jews. The whole "Jewish Question" phrase we use today comes from a book he wrote about how the Jews attempted to subvert and hold themselves above the Ethnic German people.

The sad tragedy of Marx is he was a self-hating Jew who hated his fellow Jews. He basically said "Hey guys I'm going to be writing all of this stuff, please don't do what you always do to me plz? You know... act like subversive kikes? Kthxbai"

And the kikes subverted the shit out of his and Engels work.

All Marxism we experience today is the result of the Italian kike, Antonio Gramsci. "Cultural Marxism" and the Frankfurt school... Marx would have throat punched those people.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/On%20The%20Jewish%20Question.pdf

@Sterling and @LSDMAYO Are either of you supporters of Capitalism / The free market?

So what are your criticisms of Marx specifically?

Alright, well, @LSDMAYO You're clearly a fucking retard. "ideas are falsehood"

So I'm going to continue this with Jew Jitsu and you can interrupt all you like but I'll be ignoring it.

Best not waste your time.

@Sterling That's a fair point. Alright. But do you support free markets in an ideal system?

I see you have a libertarian tag, so I'm assuming you do fundamentally support the idea of free markets

@Deleted User
Short, sweet bullet points.

My glasses are held together with duct tape right now because I bought gifts for my family instead of getting new glasses, I was going to help you create propaganda posters, but if you're that low IQ that you need to ask then you should just kill yourself faggot.

It's not rocket science. Something that can be read at a glance, something that catches the eye.

Then you should do what you're actually good at.

@LSDMAYO I think that's a pretty fucked and convoluted definition.

I've flipped through your basic bitch tier shit, it's not impressive.

Have fun with babies first red-pills.

"learn to read"

No it won't be, @Deleted User I don't play this "hurr u criticized me and said I'm not as red-pilled as I think I am u didn't read these books"

That question needs to be defined further. "The White Race" by whose definition? The White Nationalist definition? The Pan-Europeanist definition? By who's reckoning, and then I'll answer the specific question.

I'm telling you there is, because my answer would be different depending on which definition.

I'm not dancing around anything you subhuman faggot.

Define the question. If it's the White Nationalist interpretation of race IE; the preservation of phenotypical superficialities at the expense of the immaterial/ethnic/cultural manifestations of the biological/genetic/physical reality then no. I have no interest in saving something that, at current point, has zero consequential value.

Low IQ untermensch accusing his betters of being niggers.

And, you presumptuous cunt, I'd venture to guess I've read all of those books before you were born.

I have a very low opinion of classical European Fascism and differentiate National Socialism from Fascism. I have nothing good to say about Oswald Mosley or Mussolini. Their top downward approach, state corporatist economic leanings and Mosley's desire to preserve a multi-racial empire disgust me.

Again, you presumptuous cunt, I've read Mussolini's Doctrine and 90% of Mosley's works.

And if that's good enough for you, then good for you.

That's your own transposition of ideology onto what is a political vehicle.

Tell me again where the first futurist movements emerged? Mussolini's Italy? I don't agree with a social order that allows those sorts of things to exist.

Because you're ideologically possessed and transposing your own individualistic values onto the words and image of another. His approach to things amounted to preserving the British empire which is as Jewy as one can get.

What does that even mean and how is that even vaguely related to what I said.

"Mosley had no problem with retaining India because defense is better"

btich, what?

Mosley wanted to preserve the empire, Hitler trained Indians and created the Indian Legion to resist Jewry in India. 🤔

Hitler is still celebrated as a liberator in India today 🤔 🤔

That explains your complexion.