https://www.puppetstringnews.com/blog/interestingcalifornia-wildfires-map-lines-up-with-proposed-high-speed-rail-for-california?fbclid=IwAR0dCXVzlnS1rFRR6Ndk3F7znDV8ZKIOku9TJxnH86uiHo2UcPKQDBUU3Ts

Brietbart is literally a meme site.

Kek

@PenSHITLORD
Any links on those concepts of inverse square and cooling to add meat to this laser rebuttal process?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law

Basically the further the distance from the source the wider the area of the beam and the less energy per area, so you have to compensate with power if you want to burn shit through an atmosphere of water from space

And the beam would be huge, like...entire fields huge

Entire cities huge

But lets say you do have a huge fucking laser

And a huge fucking powersource

OK. This must be high up in the scroll if I missed it.

You still have to cool it, and that's not simple in space due to the fact convection does not take place in space because there are not enough molecules to transfer heat from the device to the environment.

Could an airplane house a cooling system?

Hell no, not the kind you'd need to shoot a laser like that from space.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_YAL-1

Israel has a 'DEW'

No not from space.

It's literally a building

A huge building

Signifigant difference in flying a 747 around and a satellite from space.

Yeah no shit

Yea I was answerwing the plane issue

isolation of the beam from space is a whole different ballgame

Yeah I'm not saying energy weapons don't exist, that's silly, just that from space has some serious eyebrow raising challenges that need to be addressed before it's taken seriously.

:thinking:

I can live with that.

I said earlier if I was going to hypothetically do it, I'd do something like lightning strikes with the house mains and get a little fire going

Airplanes do carry DEWs though.

Probably would emit in pulses

Yeah but the deepstate isn't flying 747's over Cali unattested, therefore the supposed DEW fires in cali aren't from airplane based DEWs

That leaves satellites, which is what most of the people who are supporting this idea are proposing anyways.

GFUYS THE FIREPLANES ARE DOING IT

I agree. Crossing off satellites is pretty safe.

And I think crossing off 747's flying unattested over cali when our airspace is literally lit with patrols can be crossed off too.

```On April 6, 2011, the U.S. Navy successfully tested a laser gun, manufactured by Northrop Grumman, that was mounted on the former USS Paul Foster, which is currently used as the navy's test ship. When engaged during the test that occurred off the coast of Central California in the Pacific Ocean test range, the laser gun was documented as having "a destructive effect on a high-speed cruising target", said Chief of Naval Research Admiral Nevin Carr.[41] While classified, the proposed range of the laser gun is measured in miles, not yards. Experimental.```

Therefore, that leaves us with the best option, people with lighters matches flares or flamethrowers operating in unison.

And dirty faggots burning their houses down when they get word the people protecting them are busted

Cheap but oh so effective

>Position yourself to benefit from disaster
>Prepare disaster
>Wait until you benefit the most
>Initiate disaster
>Fool the goys with your media
>????????
>Profit

NPR was laying the groundwork for blaming PG&E for the whole thing yesterday.
Stock also tanked 20%

FINE... I'll fucking bite, to feed your DEW shillary autism in a push for accelerating your IQ to the depths of retardation.