Message from @PenSHITLORD
Discord ID: 512755470922940434
Just a wide flange beam, MC and C channel are for smaller bridges but you get the concept
Someone put plywood under that one and pocketed the money
>live in california
>believe the DEW shill nonsense
>put mirrors on roof
ever been to petco park?
San diego?
MY HOUSE IS SAFE FROM DEW
I bet its hot as fuck in that house...
500 year roof
Solution: Reflect the laser shit back at the satellites.
problem solved.
Brietbart is literally a meme site.
Kek
@PenSHITLORD
Any links on those concepts of inverse square and cooling to add meat to this laser rebuttal process?
Basically the further the distance from the source the wider the area of the beam and the less energy per area, so you have to compensate with power if you want to burn shit through an atmosphere of water from space
And the beam would be huge, like...entire fields huge
But lets say you do have a huge fucking laser
And a huge fucking powersource
OK. This must be high up in the scroll if I missed it.
You still have to cool it, and that's not simple in space due to the fact convection does not take place in space because there are not enough molecules to transfer heat from the device to the environment.
Could an airplane house a cooling system?
Hell no, not the kind you'd need to shoot a laser like that from space.
Israel has a 'DEW'
No not from space.
It's literally a building
A huge building
Signifigant difference in flying a 747 around and a satellite from space.
Yeah no shit
Yea I was answerwing the plane issue
isolation of the beam from space is a whole different ballgame
Yeah I'm not saying energy weapons don't exist, that's silly, just that from space has some serious eyebrow raising challenges that need to be addressed before it's taken seriously.
:thinking:
I can live with that.
I said earlier if I was going to hypothetically do it, I'd do something like lightning strikes with the house mains and get a little fire going
Airplanes do carry DEWs though.