that line atleast

@Deleted User true

never read about political topics on wikipedia

Like I don't even know or care who Ted Nugent is but bringing up that he allegedly wants to kill people who want gun control 4 sentences into this guys article is bullshit

have high reputation in wikipedia + make a group of editors = change history like stalin

"encourage violence" is something that can be taken out of context way too easily

also what sega said

although there will definitely be others to thwart blatant shit

but on nuanced shit liek american politics

history is such a delicate thing its actually scary

its easy to smack down such blatant bias

agree

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9r_nMzdTu4

lol

people understand how hard it is to work for the future, setting goals and seeing what could happen (sort of what it means to be human)

but we don't understand how delicate and intricate history is

also a massive issue is how the majority of people assume history is linear

https://youtu.be/Vka2ZgzZTvo

this interview opened up my eyes

he talks about how the sphinx is actually way older, civilization is actually way older

and how solar flares could have brought armageddon at the end of the ice age

killing everyone on land

so the current dating of the egyptians is

i think 3000 bc lemme check

yeah 2150

3150*

the whole debacle about this is facinating

because you have these 80+ yo egyptoligists

that dont want this info coming out

its really amazing

https://youtu.be/Vka2ZgzZTvo

i recommend watching / listening to this

yeah Wikipedia is good for articles that are based on like, straight forward stuff

the pyramids were built atop older structures

like an old car

anything political just goes to shit

every pharaoh would write "We repaired and restored the pyramids"

but the egyptologists would translate it as

"we built the pyramids"

the sphynx up there is heavily repaired and restored

from the neck above is where the land used to be