Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 462712714318446602
I wasn't aware being conservative was controversial
the line about "HE'S ENCOURGAGED VIOLENCE AGAINST GUN CONTROL ADVOCATES"
is not at all how a wikipedia page is supposed to be written
it's supposed to be non biased
wikipedia has definitely had bias issues within recent eyars
this is blatantly written by a leftist
that line atleast
@Deleted User true
never read about political topics on wikipedia
Like I don't even know or care who Ted Nugent is but bringing up that he allegedly wants to kill people who want gun control 4 sentences into this guys article is bullshit
have high reputation in wikipedia + make a group of editors = change history like stalin
"encourage violence" is something that can be taken out of context way too easily
also what sega said
although there will definitely be others to thwart blatant shit
but on nuanced shit liek american politics
history is such a delicate thing its actually scary
its easy to smack down such blatant bias
agree
lol
people understand how hard it is to work for the future, setting goals and seeing what could happen (sort of what it means to be human)
but we don't understand how delicate and intricate history is
also a massive issue is how the majority of people assume history is linear
this interview opened up my eyes
he talks about how the sphinx is actually way older, civilization is actually way older
and how solar flares could have brought armageddon at the end of the ice age
killing everyone on land
so the current dating of the egyptians is
i think 3000 bc lemme check
yeah 2150
3150*
the whole debacle about this is facinating
because you have these 80+ yo egyptoligists
that dont want this info coming out
its really amazing
i recommend watching / listening to this
yeah Wikipedia is good for articles that are based on like, straight forward stuff
the pyramids were built atop older structures
like an old car