no, http://mp3ornot.com/ test results
u got me
try it
do some 50 tests and post results
my fbi handler gave me the invite
What is it testing? @rn
60% is an abysmal score for 320 vs 128
like damn
whether you can hear the difference between 128kb/s mp3 and 320kb/s mp3
you can't
@fallen angel post yours
you know that 128 cuts off at like 16khz right
and 320 cuts off at 20.5
all I know is that you didn't post your results yet
you have some horrific hearing or really bad transducers if you can’t hear above 16khz
who care
stop sperging
audiophi
not to mention that mp3 does some really garbage sounding psychoacoustic stuff below that as well
320kbps is placebo
192 is all that is needed
the people who think mp3 is tolerable have never heard of impulse response
or rolloff filters
I was surprised too, because I thought I could hear more of a difference when I did some converting with ffmpeg
bro have you have ytou heard of impulse repsone bro
yeah you could because you were transcoding you dumbass
i promise bro all ur music sounds shit
maybe it depends too much on the song too
FLAC is the best format
to fill your drives
transcoding a compressed file twice is not the same as transcoding an uncompressed file to a compressed one
I converted flac to 128kb/s and 196 kb/s mp3
fat loser audio codec
🤔
faggot loser audio cucks
^^^^^^^^^^^^
hey it would be epic if i clicked on the links the low life posted that would be really cool
hmmmmmmm today i shall get my IP traced
@high
Who kicked him
he’s still in the server cumbrain
