yeah, that's what I mean, there's two problems:
> how do we get people
> what do we do with the people

in lieu of a plan, find a good leader with a plan and join them

then that presents another problem:
> where is this good leader?

are you a good leader?

i wouldn't know

do you know any good leaders?

the majority of people are too concerned with other things (and too observant of the attitudes I mentioned before) to care, whether they're good leaders or not (which, to be honest, I doubt)

or afraid to not end on the winning team

anyone who forks the kernel needs to maintain it or it will rust

and they need to keep up with the competition, as in monitoring new improvements and replicating them using cleanroom reverse engineering

and they need to put all the power in the right hands

tricky

and maybe someone should make an actually not shit desktop OS, and also systemd

and that's a problem, because it's hard to find a group of people who would be up to such a task. not to mention the fact that I'm not just talking about Linux, I'm talking about fixing **everything**. which is why forking isn't a great idea, because there has to be another, cleaner, smoother way to drive out all the fucking commies other than executing them all

its a lot of work that can only be done by an incredibly talented C programmer

individual project owners are the only people who can protect their work for the community

so each individual project who has adopted the Covenant is at fault and their project is now dead and gay

you could promote projects by maintainers who are known not to buy into this, and suggest them as replacements to other SJW softwares

but the best hope for success would be if those programs ran better and had better features/ui than the traps can write

the average user does not care the politics and often neither do i. I am likely to use what I see as the best and most productive software in most cases

it tends to correlate that SJWs have low talent, so thats helpful

or it doesn't matter, because they're riding off of the success of people who are talented

remove those people and get them on your team

linux can't survive without talented C coders

jsyk these people aren't going to just abandon linux- to them, it's literally their baby

im not dumb enough to think theres no amazing traps at c code either

i think one problem is being able to pay your way onto the board, where you can make decisions

So much misinformation to unpack here
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/9i2q8d/richard_stallman_the_developers_of_linux_or_any/

1) the GPL cannot seize control of copyright over anything. What the actual fuck.

2) No, the CoC can't "prevent certain users from modifying the software". Everyone ejected from the project will still have the right to copy edit and redistribute linux on their own. Nobody gives you access to the mainline development branch in the GPL licenses. Acess to the code and access to the master branch have nothing to do with each other.

https://www.dailydot.com/debug/github-reveals-details-third-party-investigation/

Oof

If I were horvath I really, really wouldnt have admitted that

http://archive.is/FDfBN

It looks like probly they asked for a nondisparagement agreement *after* hevath said all this shit

horvath might actually be a little slow

So uh, guys, SourceForge?

harrassed == "they threatened to fire me unless I actually did some work"

?

well she dated one of the guys she says harrassed her after they broke up

immediately she shares the blame