people will if anything probly need time to organize

and what one man can do alone is often little, so you should offer to make yourself useful

after all, what would you have someone do that you cannot?

it's arguable that Linus has failed as a leader in this instance

people are shocked by that and may need some time to regroup

forking linux means nothing. get all the best kernel devs to jump ship and you have a start

of course what people can do alone is often little, that's why we're losing, because literally nobody is teaming up to do anything and the left has already infested all of the platforms people usually use to communicate (although the lefties working for Discord hasn't posed that much of a threat yet, hence why we're talking now)

start a team

one problem is youre going to need people to do a lot of presumably free work

now personally im not an open source contrib. im very poor and i want to make some actual money eventually

thats why I prefer MIT lic

i bet a thousand other people have, and nothing's happened. jsyk, gaining attention is pretty hard when literally everyone on your side has chosen the attitude of "haha everything is okay they're just stupid they'll destroy themselves eventually hahahaha" or "haha we're still the majority haha"

and another question to ask is what the hell you're going to do when you unite everyone

i mean, other than forking all the projects, which should really be the last choice since it's such a pain and a general mess and how forks probably won't take off

have a plan before you unite them

yeah, that's what I mean, there's two problems:
> how do we get people
> what do we do with the people

in lieu of a plan, find a good leader with a plan and join them

then that presents another problem:
> where is this good leader?

are you a good leader?

i wouldn't know

do you know any good leaders?

the majority of people are too concerned with other things (and too observant of the attitudes I mentioned before) to care, whether they're good leaders or not (which, to be honest, I doubt)

or afraid to not end on the winning team

anyone who forks the kernel needs to maintain it or it will rust

and they need to keep up with the competition, as in monitoring new improvements and replicating them using cleanroom reverse engineering

and they need to put all the power in the right hands

tricky

and maybe someone should make an actually not shit desktop OS, and also systemd

and that's a problem, because it's hard to find a group of people who would be up to such a task. not to mention the fact that I'm not just talking about Linux, I'm talking about fixing **everything**. which is why forking isn't a great idea, because there has to be another, cleaner, smoother way to drive out all the fucking commies other than executing them all

its a lot of work that can only be done by an incredibly talented C programmer

individual project owners are the only people who can protect their work for the community

so each individual project who has adopted the Covenant is at fault and their project is now dead and gay

you could promote projects by maintainers who are known not to buy into this, and suggest them as replacements to other SJW softwares

but the best hope for success would be if those programs ran better and had better features/ui than the traps can write

the average user does not care the politics and often neither do i. I am likely to use what I see as the best and most productive software in most cases

it tends to correlate that SJWs have low talent, so thats helpful

or it doesn't matter, because they're riding off of the success of people who are talented

remove those people and get them on your team

linux can't survive without talented C coders

jsyk these people aren't going to just abandon linux- to them, it's literally their baby

im not dumb enough to think theres no amazing traps at c code either