Message from @Ondsinet
Discord ID: 542841436278620180
holy shit she is a fucking cunt
she trollin
HOLY SHIT
LMAO
But she actually isn't, she is trying to use it to push a narrative.
that's what the purpose is.
you don't put ^-^ smileys in code to make a point
push "girls who code"
plz
She's a bimbo model.
I would expect nothing less
smh
I can't afford disillusion
i could never begin to understand coding but holy shit she is dumb
why would you claim to teach coding but then copy it from wikipedia and use wix for your website
that's the stupidest thing ive seen all day
yeah
@Den Röda Smurfen
``` for(var i = 0; i<document.getElementsByClassName("username-_4ZSMR").length;i++){
if(document.getElementsByClassName("username-_4ZSMR")[i].innerText === "bart rambo 14"){
document.getElementsByClassName("username-_4ZSMR")[i].innerText = "dumb cunt";
document.getElementsByClassName("username-_4ZSMR")[i].parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.childNodes[1].firstElementChild.lastElementChild.innerText = "CACA POOPOO"
}
}```
oh no that is some mean coding
I cry now
@galesteppes That feel when you changed majors, passed out of all programming classes in your new major, and now just draw UML over and over again.

Lol
Get fucked
the worst part is that my uni professor would probably prefer the one on the left
`My professor told us he will stab us if we use the break command.
My professor just told us that people who use break inside of loops are bad programmers. I honestly have seen it and used it wherever it helped make the program more efficient or simple to understand. Should I follow his suggestion not to ever use it even outside the exam, ie in actual code?
He also says that every variable should be declared on top, even the indexes in for loops, which means never using limited scope variables. That sounds really stupid because usually smaller scoped variable mean less errors when writing code.`
unironically what he said
and much shittier stuf
like, can't use variable scope
aka no
for(int i = 0 ...
@Ondsinet tell him that c++ is the future
fuck his c logic
but c uses all those things
one man's experience is another's premature optimisation
my guess would be, he's seen `O(m*n)` shit like
`for (i=0; i<m; ++i) {
for (j=0; j<n; ++j) {
if (some_condition(i,j)) { foo[i].bar = bar[j]; break; }
}`
too often, when it could've easily been `O(m+n)` or `O(m*log(n))` at worst.
yes hi
does the hardcover cost less than the kindle

