magic haxor

oh no that is some mean coding

I cry now

@galesteppes That feel when you changed majors, passed out of all programming classes in your new major, and now just draw UML over and over again.

Lol

Get fucked

the worst part is that my uni professor would probably prefer the one on the left

`My professor told us he will stab us if we use the break command.
My professor just told us that people who use break inside of loops are bad programmers. I honestly have seen it and used it wherever it helped make the program more efficient or simple to understand. Should I follow his suggestion not to ever use it even outside the exam, ie in actual code?

He also says that every variable should be declared on top, even the indexes in for loops, which means never using limited scope variables. That sounds really stupid because usually smaller scoped variable mean less errors when writing code.`

unironically what he said

and much shittier stuf

like, can't use variable scope

aka no
for(int i = 0 ...

@Ondsinet tell him that c++ is the future

fuck his c logic

but c uses all those things

one man's experience is another's premature optimisation

my guess would be, he's seen `O(m*n)` shit like
`for (i=0; i<m; ++i) {
for (j=0; j<n; ++j) {
if (some_condition(i,j)) { foo[i].bar = bar[j]; break; }
}`
too often, when it could've easily been `O(m+n)` or `O(m*log(n))` at worst.

yes hi

Is this book good?

@M4Gunner wait

does the hardcover cost less than the kindle

if buy used, barely

im sure i can easily find this pdf for free

hmm

i never trust bestsellers

because they usually appeal to normies

if people buy it, it sucks

fact

if the theater is full, the film sucks

and normies do love refactoring

they love the idea of it

but do they love doing it

doubt

they love to try

ah yes I replaced
i = i+1
with i++

this must make code faster

incorrect--it will compile to the same code

but it reads faster, which is still an improvement

@galesteppes @Durtle02 @Ondsinet @M4Gunner

Nano > vim