🤣 https://www.kotaku.com.au/2018/08/inside-the-culture-of-sexism-at-riot-games/ 🤣

Maybe this is why I keep getting LoL ads on my videos

Although I thought I'd only watched *maybe* two videos talking about it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXookeCEbG8

I have like 2000 bucks sank into league of legends

Cause I'm a responsible person ecks dee

kek

For those of you that have a life and don't Play league of legends you may not know of the shit storm that is going around involving Riot at PAX. Personally I think reddit is overreacted since it's minor compared to Riot bending over in general to SJWs. Anyway soon after the incident this rag: https://docs.google.com/document/d/13w2oijkwfYblNlTSKG_2E09z7tiiuxhmb6-7UxWKLU0/edit began to be passed around. Now all the references are anecdotal or blog posts except for one: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/09/14/1211286109/tab-article-info. I already spent a good amount of time reading it and finding issues with the way the study was handled but I want to get a second opinion. The reason I ask is that people are now using it to fully justify the PAX controversy. Does the study appear to you guys to have validity?

inclusive and **fair for all**

except white men

right?

me?

https://twitter.com/riotgames/status/1034848376527904768?s=19

rip their company I guess

this is what corporate suicide looks like, take note

@Musica It's an interesting article with an interesting conclusion, BUT the sample size is rather small and not really reprsentative

last i heard they were looking into instead of giving out bonuses that were stated in contracts and instead replacing them with something of no monetary value because it's aa power structure if you get payed for hard work. SO yeah their going to eat shit for this,

They already had a massive record of the CLiche issue now this

"no monetary value"

good luck getting new highers outside of SJWs

And you have no control of how the professors they send it to would have reacted to a candidte of the opposite sex

like spa resort weekends and material shit that women care about?

more like a literal gold star

they may just have at random picked profs that would have paod less and those got the female ones

lol wow

gold snowflakes

from what I have heard described as the new alternative

that's definitely a strong incentive to work for their company

I'd love to have my hard work recognised by gold stars

wait didn't McDonald's *have* gold stars but then remove them

because it made people feel inferior?

I don't understand why they are responding like this theres no validity to the claims made against them.

Like i get Balancing of the game yeah listen to the community but why would you listen to reddit or kotatku on how you should run you "indie" company if it's the #1 played game

because *gaming journalism is ethical, unbiased and entirely factual*

Journalist are writers what do they know about running a billion dollar subsidiary to Tencent

of course they're experts

didn't you see that guy demolishing cuphead

lol

that got blown out of proportion that video is up there with the Mcdonalds coffee lawsuit (she had 3rd degree burns it was valid). the cup head video has two stories 1st it was joke video that was going around the office the person who is playing cup head was making fun of the tutorial. 2nd it was footage recorded while the journalist was spending their time focused on interviewing the developers and they just moved their hands while they asked questions. Both of which sound more valid then a grown adult being unable to to do something a 3 year old can do.

idk man

I could host a conference and play better than that