Message from @meratrix

Discord ID: 543876096131858443


2019-02-09 19:13:41 UTC  

Chris Quinn

2019-02-09 19:14:04 UTC  

Time to write to my reps

2019-02-09 19:14:18 UTC  

Haha

2019-02-09 19:14:23 UTC  

GTA tax

2019-02-09 19:14:40 UTC  

Are they Christians of progressives?

2019-02-09 19:15:05 UTC  

I'm just gonna say, something along the lines of if you want to tax violent video games than you have to tax violent music, movies, and comics

2019-02-09 19:15:16 UTC  

all or nothing pussies

2019-02-09 19:15:42 UTC  

<:think_woke:378717098681171988>

2019-02-09 19:15:49 UTC  

Metal is satanic

2019-02-09 19:17:23 UTC  

Eh it wont go anywhere. It failed to pass committee the first time, and is in committee atm. The ESA is fighting it hard. And not long ago PA voted to make Feb the state Espoets month.

2019-02-09 19:18:20 UTC  

Send them this study as well

2019-02-09 19:18:45 UTC  

`Don't watch Devil Man, you become violent!
Don't read Spider Man, you become violent
Don't listen to Method Man, you become violent!
Imagine what's a day in parliament`

2019-02-09 19:21:16 UTC  

The reason it wont pass is because its targeted at video games which makes it unconstitutional per scotus.

However if they jist have an amusement tax, on all forms of media. That is legal, see chicago.

2019-02-09 19:27:37 UTC  

@Durtle02 Hello Representative ____________, I am a constituent of your district. I am writing out of concern for the recently proposed House Bill 109 concerning a 10% tax on violent video games and linking them to school shootings. This has been a long debated topic on the national level, and has time and time again been brought up as a wedge issue. My concerns are thus; time and time again, studies are released showing that exposure to violent video games does not cause an increase in violent tendencies. I have linked one such study here, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-018-0031-7. The reasoning for putting any sort of tax on "violent video games" to pay for school safety is based on a false assumption that "violent video games" are the cause of increased violent tendencies. The ESA has already released a statement concerning the bill, "The US Supreme Court made clear in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association & Entertainment Software Association that video games are entitled to the full protection of the Constitution, and that efforts, like Pennsylvania's, to single out video games based on their content will be struck down". I hope you will make your decision to vote on this bill based off of the facts produced by countless studies and constitutional law, not baseless assumption and assertion so commonly used against the video game industry.

2019-02-09 19:27:41 UTC  

This is what I wrote

2019-02-09 19:28:57 UTC  

nice and respectful, to the point, and good grammar

2019-02-09 19:28:58 UTC  

irr most school shooters did not play any games of notice

2019-02-09 19:29:02 UTC  

seems good

2019-02-09 19:29:26 UTC  

😀

2019-02-09 19:29:53 UTC  

im in maryland, so i cant help much worry about my neighbors, especially since you guys saved the country in 2016

2019-02-09 19:31:53 UTC  

My representative's office is literally like a ten minute walk from my house. If I wasn't away at college I'd gladly request to meet with the guy in person.

2019-02-09 19:32:13 UTC  

@meratrix one change its not just violent ones. Its any rated Mature or Adult.

2019-02-09 19:33:09 UTC  

I've sent it in already. I see what you mean, but I think I need to use the language he'd be familiar with. Most people aren't even aware that there is a rating system.

2019-02-09 19:33:21 UTC  

They are using the auspices of violence to tax more than viokence, and really not tax all violence cause there is quite a bit of it in rated T games.

2019-02-09 19:33:24 UTC  

@meratrix I know the dude, I'm not just gonna copy pasta him lmao

2019-02-09 19:34:03 UTC  

I requested a response, which he is obligated to send me, so if I need to clarify that a rating system does already exist in a follow up I definitely will.

2019-02-09 19:36:13 UTC  

Eh tbh i have never been a fan of the rating system anyways. The ESRB is made up of reps from various companies, they charge for the ratings, and have been known to use this to edge out smaller developers. As well, none of it is actually legally binding. Yes some companies have company rules about selling M games to those under 18, but it isnt like alcohol or tobacco.

2019-02-09 19:41:22 UTC  

Yeah, but just live movie ratings, it's up the parents to be responsible.

2019-02-09 19:42:23 UTC  

The rating system is just there to provide information to the parents so they can make an informed descision.

2019-02-09 19:46:09 UTC  

the ratings systems that we have now is just fine. it the parents that need to step up there jobs on what content they let their kids play and watch

2019-02-09 19:47:07 UTC  

^ this

2019-02-09 19:50:26 UTC  

Tbh move ratings are far more inforced than video game ones.

2019-02-09 19:51:27 UTC  

@Nordhand theres a downside. Parents are becoming less and less allowed to be parents. And tbh this tax isnt about stopping people from playing. Its just a money grab.

2019-02-09 19:51:37 UTC  

yep ^

2019-02-09 20:18:28 UTC  

Ah yes Jim Sterling who wanted a game pulled off of steam because it was VIOLENT and offensive towards anti bolsonaro and the Brazilian establishment has an opinion now huh. Fuck the PIG.

2019-02-09 20:22:12 UTC  

Ugh his comments are literally bunch of npcs repeating his bs word by word lmao

2019-02-09 20:23:15 UTC  

I watched a razorfist video the other day and he totally destroyed sterling

2019-02-09 20:23:23 UTC  

it was savage and hilarious

2019-02-09 20:24:10 UTC  

wich one?