Message from @méep
Discord ID: 391730665999040515
lol
Since when is beeing a veterinarian opresed
yes I did
they had a sample size of 100+
Wait a second, didn't Australia just try the whole "resumes can't have gender information", only to find that women got hired even less?
It is a hard proffesion
i.e. before, they were being hired for their vagina points.
KEK
@DanielKO yes
They didn't give the same people both resumes because that would be obvious
guess what
what about vagina point hirings @méep
oh wait
different people will offer different salaries
@DanielKO australian government already was hiring women for falsely inflated reasons
innoveint through huh?
@méep prove it then
you fuck
I'm not a fan
what ever you say
everyone should just become educated to remove their biases
So you'd rather them not have a job? /s
Well, then I don't see why you would call yourself feminist.
^
Because that's definitely not what's taught in Gender Studies departments.
of which I have provided a yet to be refuted source that it exists
@méep The quote said that they didn't give both resumes to one person, because of course they wouldn't, but, the problem is then that different people will offer different salaries to the applicant because they are different fucking people
how about your source sucks
is that good enough?
thus, it is a shit study
@meratrix individual quirks are factored out when you account for sample size dipshit
you wouldn't see replicable trends if it was just human error
Give us one example of discrimination you're fighting against.
you source is shit
um, no dipshit. It's still diferent people, and because the sample size is one fucking resume, it's worthless
period
you dickless knave