there was alot of molten metal after those towers collapsed.

and it cant be jet fuel that melted it.

kek

you think the government could keep something like that secret?

its public info just go an look

when it has people who send sensitive emails from their laptops

and other ignorants running it

also building 7

keep on believin'

i mean most people dont even have looked what really happened. only what media told.

just google wtc7 and see your self

and the rest have looked at conspiracy nutjob sites, that either fail to understand basic science, or utterly misrepresent facts in order to goad on the gullible

so you havent even looked what they really say

Oh I have looked over a few, here and there, and it's all been unconvincing. I doubt anything you could present me with would change my mind, but I won't dismiss it without having seen it.

so whats your explanation to WTC7?

thermal expansion

+ progressive collapse

simple explanation, that the investigators also arrived at, afaik.

why shouldn't I believe this?

so that fire was pure coincidence that it happened same time as those airplanes hit towers. and it collapsed in few minutes after fire started.🤔

even tought any other steal structure building have never collapsed same way. or so fast.🤔

shekelstein

That's because they upped the building codes after that lmfao

yes, fire is pretty hot, it can make things expand fast

An plane exploding in tower is going to create a fire

heavy material falling down is pretty destructive, it can make things collapse pretty fast.

@Durtle02 no the WTC7

plane never hit that one

it being unprecedented does not make it impossible

[7:05 PM] Mal: you think the government could keep something like that secret?
i dont belive anything "its just concpiracy"

and most people dont even have looked in to it.🤔

I looked into it again just now, the investigation that was done makes sense

do you have a better explanation than "it was an inside job", because thermal expansion + progressive collapse is currently in the lead for my support by about a factor of a billion.

I'd like to hear your take on it

so you rather belive that it collapsed because fire that by coincidece happend same time as those planes hit towers 1 and 2. even tought building like that shouldnt even be possible to collapse because of fire.

and burining wasnt even hot, black smoke tells lack of oxygen.

"shouldn't even be possible" a study was done to show it was indeed possible

you're not scoring any points there, I'm afraid

the study proved it was possible to reach the required temperatures by fire from office debris

again, you're not winning any points here

science shows it's possible, I'll stick by the science