Message from @DanielKO

Discord ID: 432974559797575690


2018-04-09 18:40:28 UTC  

Guns wouldn't have changed that

2018-04-09 18:40:50 UTC  

Even if it's the army; would any soldier volunteer to be the first to enter into a building full or Jews fearful for their lives, and packing heat?

2018-04-09 18:40:59 UTC  

There is a few exemples in France and Poland, people without guns that formed a resistance group and fought the Nazis

2018-04-09 18:41:39 UTC  

Guns won't give you a fighting spirit

2018-04-09 18:42:00 UTC  

Either you have it or acquire it

2018-04-09 18:42:13 UTC  

If you don't have it, you don't have it, and guns won't change that

2018-04-09 18:43:48 UTC  

French and Polish resistance were unarmed? Where you getting *that* from?

2018-04-09 18:44:06 UTC  

And an old man can have as much fighting spirit as he wants, it ain't gonna mean shit if he can't fight

2018-04-09 18:44:19 UTC  

@Reaps
At the start, they acquired guns after

2018-04-09 18:44:22 UTC  

Here's a recent example: Brazil has slums, right? Weren't they occupied by the army just recently to reestablish order? How did that work out?

2018-04-09 18:44:37 UTC  

@DanielKO
Wonderfully, violence is dropping

2018-04-09 18:44:43 UTC  

What are you trying to imply?

2018-04-09 18:44:51 UTC  

And this is not an example at all

2018-04-09 18:45:00 UTC  

Doesn't the police have guns too?

2018-04-09 18:45:33 UTC  

@Reaps
I remember watching 2 polish partisans speaking how they got guns, it was quite interesting

2018-04-09 18:45:39 UTC  

What's that? Was the police afraid to get shot?

2018-04-09 18:45:46 UTC  

@DanielKO
Yeah, they don't have the manpower and the equipment to do it

2018-04-09 18:45:53 UTC  

Again, it's apple and oranges

2018-04-09 18:45:54 UTC  

And there you have it.

2018-04-09 18:46:06 UTC  

You are just trying to give me shit because you can't make an argument

2018-04-09 18:46:19 UTC  

If everyone can have a gun, around every corner, on every window, on every building, you don't go crushing your own people.

2018-04-09 18:46:27 UTC  

Loooooool

2018-04-09 18:46:34 UTC  

Their efficacy was extremely low with the abscence of firearms; we're also talking about occuppied countries during a war, rather than pre-39 people

2018-04-09 18:46:39 UTC  

They are not fighting the population, they are fighting organized crime

2018-04-09 18:46:53 UTC  

Again, it's apple and oranges

2018-04-09 18:46:56 UTC  

Which I assume is a minority of the population in the slums, right?

2018-04-09 18:47:03 UTC  

Yeah

2018-04-09 18:47:17 UTC  

Yet, they make it too hostile for police to deal with it.

2018-04-09 18:47:25 UTC  

Yeah

2018-04-09 18:47:59 UTC  

You actually can't see the difference?

2018-04-09 18:47:59 UTC  

The point is, the Nazis would have to patrol their cities with military to fight off a significant amount of armed civilians that could potentially shoot them from anywhere.

2018-04-09 18:48:20 UTC  

It's not like the Nazis steqmrolled entire villages because a few people shot at them

2018-04-09 18:48:30 UTC  

I'm not saying the population can outgun the army, but they could certainly make them wary of steamrolling everyone.

2018-04-09 18:48:32 UTC  

No, they would just kill everyone and call it a day

2018-04-09 18:48:41 UTC  

Like

2018-04-09 18:48:42 UTC  

And it's not like that wasn't a huge propoganda coup for the allies when they did it

2018-04-09 18:48:43 UTC  

They did

2018-04-09 18:48:44 UTC  

Lol

2018-04-09 18:48:54 UTC  

They did still

2018-04-09 18:49:10 UTC  

And even with them doing it

2018-04-09 18:49:22 UTC  

The majority of people didn't stand up and fought