very few

soooooooo..

fucks sake, how about that "anti-semitism -awareness-act" they introduced recently

giving fedgov claim to cut schools funding if a student group on campus "delegitimizes" "demonizes" or "holds to a double standard(thats fucking rich)" the state of Israel

I'll look into it

source link on that?

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RS22967.pdf

there's an entire website devoted to foreign aid breakdown, but I don't appear to have it bookmarked

reading through it it sounds like the money is given to Israel who on their word alone are supposed to give it to the paleys

when it isn't subject to holds, reductions or delays for any number of fucking double-speak terms

the beginning of the summary even begins with saying "yeah, we're trying to shut this shit off"

alright then, we're supposedly aiding paleys........ while letting Israel steamroll over them and abusing our power in the bad-joke-gone-on-too-long UN

who are entirely to blame for that situation to fucking begin with

but again, would seriously not give as much of a fuck if we could just stop burning money over it

versterven - 05/13/2018
and people who call bolivia an example of successful socialism now are also wrong

this

morales is a dictator

I completely forgot bolivia even exists

he silences his opposition by jailing journalists

my uncle had to fight in court for a long time to avoid being jailed

for working for previous governments

nationalist ones

anyway

has anyone read The Green Book™?

gaddafi's libya was a better example of successful socialism than bolivia

libya was richer in GDP per capita than the US

for a time

gaddafi's libya was also not a fucking sharia slave market

it actually wasnt

some islamic law was enforced there

but burqas and stuff

werent required

people who argue against socialism conveniently ignore libya

how much socialism are we talking? cuz the scandi bloks aren't doing that bad either

>how much socialism

no

you're either socialist or you're not

scandinavian countries arent socialist

they are free market capitalist with social programs

no, that's exactly it. I meant ratio of social policies