Message from @BobbyE
Discord ID: 463511148264685568
How ironic.
Anti American <:kermit_wat:378719408534716426>
I dont think the people who signed the declaration of independence would have agreed with you my dude
If marriage has no meaning other than "receive benefits from the state", then everyone should get it, even people without partners.
yeah, i don't think the people who signed the declaration of independence would have agreed with an authoritarian society also
If "marriage" means "people trying to raise their own family", then it has a special purpose.
death penalty for gays
@BobbyE Fight back against what? the straw man you just built?
Like jesus dude stop being a brainlet
The first English statute against homosexuality was placed on the
books by Parliament in 1533, under Henry VIII. This law, which
made it a capital felony for any person to "commit the detestable and
abominable vice of buggery with mankind or beast,"
No, against the regressive left in general.
I say, let gays be gays, let people form civil unions if they want to. Don't pretend it's marriage though.
@DanConway
1533
Let's face it, that post just shows who the demorats and the "progressive" left really are.
Accordingly, "An Act Amending the Penal Laws" was passed
on September 15, 1786, with a provision that anyone convicted of
"robbery, burglary, sodomy, or buggary" should suffer, not death,
but the forfeit of all his lands and goods and servitude for a term "
that's a bit old, don't you think?
1786 my dude
sounds real progressive of them
yeah, because society of today is the same society of 1786
you made the 4th of July argument not me
We could just go with, marriage is not a legal status. I'd be fine with that.
yeah, and reduce homosexuals to second class citizens
totally makes sense
@Fulcrum010 The problem with that statement is that it could be used against anything, especially against our constitutional rights.
How so?
just because your little friend in the sky said so
lol
If marriage is not a legal status, neither heterosexuals nor gays would be "married", as far as the state is concerned.
Marriage being a legal status is primarily for child custody.
And joint accounts.
Could be handled with a civil union contract.
Dog custody, house custody, car custody, just as important.
I'd not consider dog custody on the same level as child custody.
I mean, I love dogs and all, but yeah.
lol
this is a fucking joke
Cannot believe people disagree in 2018^
nah, i cannot believe 2 americans are against freedom 2 days before fourth of july