it's not pee

wait...

are you serious

....

i will go back to my studies

it is literally pee

It... is pee.

There is a reason it comes out from the urethra.

Please include me in the screenshot

@Deleted User

```
The subsequent chemical analysis of the fluid samples confirmed that two of these women did ejaculate fluid that was almost entirely urine. However, the other five, despite also producing mostly urine, also showed traces of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in their orgasmic produce.```

So, it's pee. Might have something else mixed in.

so to be correct

it is mostly pee

Like 99.999% urine.

@DanielKO
that's what i'm reading right now

"Traces" means a few PPM likely.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26772-female-ejaculation-comes-in-two-forms-scientists-find#.VLzXAEesV8E

It comes out of the urethra. There is nothing attached to the urethra other than the bladder.

Also, lol, that image.

"no one knew" even I knew.

"What research has been done on the fluid?
There still hasn't been enough research on the fluid (ejaculate) – partly because it's difficult to obtain adequate supplies of it for investigation. Also, large scientific funds tend to be available for life-threatening diseases rather than for sexual problems!

However, recent research suggests that perhaps the ejaculate is an alkaline liquid that isn't like urine, because it doesn't contain urea or creatinine, which are normal urinary constituents. The fluid tends to be clear coloured and allegedly doesn't stain bedclothes yellow.

Researchers have claimed that it contains some chemical ingredients similar to those produced by the male prostate – notably PSA (prostate-specific antigen). It is also said to contain two sugars: glucose and fructose.

Since 2000, an increasing number of researchers have suggested the liquid may be the secretion of Skene's glands (the paraurethral glands). These are tiny structures which lie around the female urethra (the urinary pipe).

In 2007, Viennese researcher Dr Florian Wimpissinger published an important study on two women who habitually ejaculated. (Incidentally, this surname is not some sort of joke. Dr Wimpissinger genuinely is a well-known urologist in Vienna.) He and his colleagues found that the ejaculate from these two females was chemically different from that of their urine.

In particular, it contained more prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), more prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and also some glucose."

dafuq

seems to not be actually pee

```
The ban on female ejaculation in UK porn is based on the fact that the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) considers films which include material featuring “urolagnia” – sexual pleasure associated with urination – as obscene under the UK Obscene Publications Act.```

Lmao, that name.

"What does this mean for women?
It's now evident that a substantial minority of women do ejaculate when they climax. This could be urine in some cases, but in other cases it seems that it isn't.

Clearly, much more research needs to be done on the contentious subject of female ejaculation, and on the nature of the fluid.The 2014 French ultrasound studies of women climaxing need to be repeated, with a lot more females taking part.

Finally, women who experience ejaculation should realise that they needn't feel ashamed of it, and that many partners have a pretty positive attitude towards it.

In other words, a lot of male (or indeed, female) partners actually like it. If a woman ejaculates, her partner may well regard it as a tribute to their virility and skill in bed."

some are urine

some aren't

and there is no scientific consensus what it actually is

“This study presents convincing evidence that squirting in women is chemically similar to urine, and also contains small amounts of PSA that is present in men’s and women’s true ejaculate,” says Barry Komisaruk, also at Rutgers.

chemically similar 🤔

@DanConway
have you read the part i posted?

Okay, biology 101.

Urethra.

Connects to bladder.

Bladder stores pee.

êven the gay dude knows my dude

dude

What research has been done on the fluid?
There still hasn't been enough research on the fluid (ejaculate) – partly because it's difficult to obtain adequate supplies of it for investigation. Also, large scientific funds tend to be available for life-threatening diseases rather than for sexual problems!

However, recent research suggests that perhaps the ejaculate is an alkaline liquid that isn't like urine, because it doesn't contain urea or creatinine, which are normal urinary constituents. The fluid tends to be clear coloured and allegedly doesn't stain bedclothes yellow.

Researchers have claimed that it contains some chemical ingredients similar to those produced by the male prostate – notably PSA (prostate-specific antigen). It is also said to contain two sugars: glucose and fructose.

Since 2000, an increasing number of researchers have suggested the liquid may be the secretion of Skene's glands (the paraurethral glands). These are tiny structures which lie around the female urethra (the urinary pipe).

In 2007, Viennese researcher Dr Florian Wimpissinger published an important study on two women who habitually ejaculated. (Incidentally, this surname is not some sort of joke. Dr Wimpissinger genuinely is a well-known urologist in Vienna.) He and his colleagues found that the ejaculate from these two females was chemically different from that of their urine.

In particular, it contained more prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), more prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and also some glucose."

pee is stored in the balls