it's not pedo, because it's not a kid

how am i not suprised

Man, I'm not arguing it's disgusting.

You mean you don't live the San Andreus Life @LordCaledus

I think it _is_ degenerate

yea im just going to stop

Degenerate and being evil on the level of molesting kids, when there are no kids involved? Yeah, no.

Again, Point to an "Adult" 18 year old. The features arn't that much different from 14-17.

So where is the line in the sand?

we have drawn the lines for our society

there are 14 yo more developed than 18 yo

cross them if you dare

And in the law's eyes, that's fine

@DanConway
the lines are based on maturity, not body features

how do you judge that on a robot?

But when it's a robot that is literally no different, even in "birth date", than one with more developed features, where is the difference

very simple

The law says "18 yo" unless you are also a child.

An 18 year old is more mature than a 14 year old, thus the difference.

Yeah, but we'd be normalizing pedophila if we allow sex robots that are based on children.

And every state has different ages

@BobbyE
Kinda

A robot with tits is no more or less mature than a robot without tits

In the same way Doom normalizes murder?

Or would that be CoD?

Or Mortal Kombat

if you really think their is no difference

Or Battlefield

or this equals video games

Every Country has a different age as well

there is no difference

I rather not risk it Augusto, IDK about you. It's either they get mental help FAST, or die.

you might em retarded

There isn't one. You are equating IRL crimes with fiction

it's the same shit as comparing a table with a kid

Is dan jf?

You might as well be making the same argument as Jack Thompson

if it is against the law it is a crime

Its not a "Hard line" and you can't equate it to a robot that doesn't have an actual "Date of Birth"

@BobbyE
What do you prefer, the pedo fucking a robot or the pedo fucking a kid?

implying they will not move from robot to child