Message from @DanConway
Discord ID: 463546526673666059
My argument literally hinged on the fact that lolis _don't_ normalize it
You really see only black and white
soooooooooooooo
is it just used to put words in some elses mouth
So implication isn't a real thing
K
i can just say implication and
poof that is someones arguement
Or you can look at an implication
An actual implication
And call it such
that is how you are using it
Or were you suggesting pedophilic behavior should be allowed?
you seem to have been
I gave you the benefit of the doubt and assumed that associating lolis with pedophiles meant you were implying it should be banned
because of the implication
The implication of what, lolis _not_ being pedophilia?
Again
Because that was my clearly stated argument
You honestly don't know the definition of "implication"
to put words in my mouth
Not even close
that i did not say
look back
Once again, when you call something pedophilic behavior
you can scroll up
Which you did
it is not hard
and reread
God, you're infantile
i never called for porn to be banned
or can you not read as well
Sure
say the dude who is arguing for ethical pedo
“I don’t want porn to be banned, I just want no one to see it”
I just dont want to look at it
You know, "Ethical Pedo" is sounding a lot like other buzzwords, like "Homophobic"
and i want it to be recognized that is an addiction that can be bad for you
“And I’m going to use all the instruments of the state to accomplish it”
just like cigarettes