Your words only lead towards a "Ban"

But that's a matter of regulation

something can provide no benefit and be not illegal

Because it is "Against the traditions"!

but you are projecting other arguments onto me

IT IS JUST INDULGENCE AND INDULGENCE IS A SIN

Your words lead to ban

lol

Based on your previous arguements

lol how does pornography benefit society?

Look, when you're - for example - calling something pedophilia

please inform me

The implication is it should be banned

Likewise with your arguments since

muh implication

Implication is an actual thing

and your implication is the normalization of pedophilia

That it's overused by people who don't know the definition doesn't change that.

sooooooooo

My argument literally hinged on the fact that lolis _don't_ normalize it

You really see only black and white

soooooooooooooo

is it just used to put words in some elses mouth

So implication isn't a real thing

K

i can just say implication and

poof that is someones arguement

Or you can look at an implication

An actual implication

And call it such

that is how you are using it

Or were you suggesting pedophilic behavior should be allowed?

you seem to have been

I gave you the benefit of the doubt and assumed that associating lolis with pedophiles meant you were implying it should be banned

because of the implication

The implication of what, lolis _not_ being pedophilia?

Again

Because that was my clearly stated argument

You honestly don't know the definition of "implication"

i am using it as you have

to put words in my mouth